PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Jimmy Johnson on WFAN

Status
Not open for further replies.
That could be simply because the tape was confiscated before it was used. If you want to extrapolate that to mean, "The Patriots would not have gotten an advantage even if they'd gotten away with it." that's speculation.

But I don't have to make that extrapolation because it's a moot point, and I haven't been arguing it. And, I've never made the extrapolation that "The Patriots WOULD have gotten an advantage if they'd gotten away with it." That's a speculation that, clearly, you did make at first. However, it needs to be noted that, under the "different interpretation" argument regarding use for future games, saying that there would have been no edge gained in the game at hand would not, in fact, be extrapolation. It would be, in fact, the precise argument of Bill Belichick.
 
But I don't have to make that extrapolation because it's a moot point, and I haven't been arguing it. And, I've never made the extrapolation that "The Patriots WOULD have gotten an advantage if they'd gotten away with it." That's a speculation that, clearly, you did make at first. However, it needs to be noted that, under the "different interpretation" argument regarding use for future games, saying that there would have been no edge gained in the game at hand would not, in fact, be extrapolation. It would be, in fact, the precise argument of Bill Belichick.
Agreed, I never thought they were getting an advantage in the same game (actually, I'm of the belief that would be impossible), but I think the intent of what they were doing was to get an advantage in a future game. While you could call that speculation or whatever you want, to me it's common sense, the Patriots don't do things if they don't expect a benefit out of it. They're not going to pay some camera guy to shoot the Jets sideline if there's nothing in it for them, are you really arguing otherwise??

Man, I'm not even sure what we're arguing any more.
 
Last edited:
Agreed, I never thought they were getting an advantage in the same game (actually, I'm of the belief that would be impossible), but I think the intent of what they were doing was to get an advantage in a future game. While you could call that speculation or whatever you want, to me it's common sense, the Patriots don't do things if they don't expect a benefit out of it. They're not going to pay some camera guy to shoot the Jets sideline if there's nothing in it for them, are you really arguing otherwise??

Man, I'm not even sure what we're arguing any more.

What do you say to the notion that we just let this die?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
2 weeks ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top