Patriots Local News:

SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:USA TODAY


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:USA TODAY


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:USA TODAY


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:NESN

Patsfans.com

Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: Lions
Thu
Aug 8th
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Bad Decision
Boomer Esiason has normally been respectful of Brady, but made some poor decisions with his comments last week about the Patriots QB.

Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

Jim Nagy, Tedy Bruschi on how Patriots draft

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by ctpatsfan77, Apr 11, 2019.

  1. BaconGrundleCandy

    BaconGrundleCandy Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    May 31, 2016
    Messages:
    6,194
    Likes Received:
    3,037
    Ratings:
    +8,021
    I guess it depends. I have a cut off & if you don't get an (X) grade you're an udfa type. I get your point though. Imo theres very little difference between anything after the 4th-udfa.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Thank You Thank You x 1
  2. BaconGrundleCandy

    BaconGrundleCandy Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    May 31, 2016
    Messages:
    6,194
    Likes Received:
    3,037
    Ratings:
    +8,021
    Thats bc hes terrible Ken.

    *Edit* Oh wow you really like him? I definitely read that wrong.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2019
  3. SammyBlueCat

    SammyBlueCat PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Messages:
    5,887
    Likes Received:
    2,489
    Ratings:
    +9,520
    Plus a history of injuries or controversy can cause a good player to be skipped.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. patfanken

    patfanken PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,020
    Likes Received:
    7,789
    Ratings:
    +19,494
    That's was never my point....and I think you know it. They drafted him to be a safety. He couldn't wasn't good enough to get on the field ahead of McCourty, Chung and Harmon. However after getting to Detroit he was a solid starter for them for a few years.

    The point is that he wasn't a horrible football player and it wasn't some disaster of a pick. We can play the " well they COULD have had player X instead of ...." every year if we want to really torture ourselves. There have been SOOO many of those posts over the years that it makes wonder how it was possible that we've had any success at all. :rolleyes:
     
  5. primetime

    primetime Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,138
    Likes Received:
    2,056
    Ratings:
    +10,967
    You're going to be disappeared any minute now
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    27,779
    Likes Received:
    3,597
    Ratings:
    +12,680
    While I was responding to your post, I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth. I'm not arguing that Wilson and Richards were bad players, per se. What every one has spent years trying to understand is why Belichick felt both of them were worth drafting in the second round.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. PittPatriot

    PittPatriot PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    4,963
    Likes Received:
    415
    Ratings:
    +2,392
    Great post and points, as always Ken.
    I just don’t think he was worthy of a 2nd round pick.
     
  8. patfanken

    patfanken PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,020
    Likes Received:
    7,789
    Ratings:
    +19,494
    Well if were Wilson I'd be more than insulted that my name be mentioned in the same breath as Richards. He WAS a bad player as well as a piss poor pick.....as it turned out. But we all know THAT happens almost half the time for every team.

    BTW- I rarely get pissed of myself when a pick doesn't work out. That is simply the nature of the process. However I do get riled sometimes when a player is unjustly criticized just because it didn't work out here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. patfanken

    patfanken PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,020
    Likes Received:
    7,789
    Ratings:
    +19,494
    Fair enough. You were in good company. There were a LOT of guys who get paid a lot of money to "know", who didn't "know" Tavon Wilson. ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. BaconGrundleCandy

    BaconGrundleCandy Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    May 31, 2016
    Messages:
    6,194
    Likes Received:
    3,037
    Ratings:
    +8,021
    Wilson was a much better player imo but I don't think it's a stretch to say both were big time reaches at the time & now.

    Its obvious why both were picked though. Bill doesn't like surprises, likes knowing what he's getting. The stronger the character the higher the value he places on a prospect.

    Wilson w his versatility, tenacity & "Coach" Richards.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. stinkypete

    stinkypete In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,805
    Likes Received:
    227
    Ratings:
    +812
    Wilson wasn't drafted to be safety #4 in 2012, he was drafted to be the starting SS in 2013 and beyond. Chung was falling out of favor and approaching free agency in 2012 and was almost completely out of rotation by the end of that year.

    Looking at Wilson's playing time in 2013, the pick appears almost indefensible. He was healthy for 13 out of 16 weeks and could only muster 2% of the defensive reps over Steve Gregory?
     
  12. SBLIII

    SBLIII 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes Received:
    614
    Ratings:
    +2,708
    The numbers indicate that an elite DB is much more valuable than an elite DL. That's really my point. It's about positional value.

    Elite coverage is the 2nd most important trait for a football team behind the QB play.

    There is a reason BB pays McCourty, Gilmore and not Flowers and drafts a DB regulary early to increase his chances of more elite DB play.

    To find an Aaron Donald is harder, yes I'm not arguing it but Gilmore offers more value and WAR.

    The Pats started winning Super Bowls again once we had multiple elite DBs.
    2014 Revis, McCourty
    2016 Butler, McCourty
    2018 Gilmore, McCourty, McCourty
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. TomPatriot

    TomPatriot PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    5,374
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Ratings:
    +5,275
    Every year they have a list of potential UDFAs predraft.
     
    • Thank You Thank You x 1
  14. Pat the Pats Fan

    Pat the Pats Fan In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    4,851
    Likes Received:
    571
    Ratings:
    +2,731
    Good enough to be on the team, but not good enough for any team to expend draft capital on them. I think that just shows the imperfect science of drafting....and that there isn’t a quantifiable measure of heart, desire and determination.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page

Search For Links: - CLOSE
For searches with multiple players
add commas (Ex: "Brady, Gronkowski")