Is the team better off without Brady?

[Modest]

I mean he is Mr California now and has a supermodel wife and 2 kids to put up with now.

Or better off without Belichick? He's obviously more concerned with other people's wives than he is coaching football.

Or Wilfork? He obviously is more concerned with losing weight and admittedly starves himself rather than playing football. (Video - Vince Wilfork Interview on WEEI)

Or Welker? Obviously that new robo-knee can't hold up for long.

Or Brandon Spikes? He'd obviously rather put on a show for Chatroullete than focus on football.



Seriously, stop with the 'Is the team better off without player X' threads. Its causing me to go blind. :bricks:

 

[BradyMossWelker]

We already have enough sarcasm threads here.

 

[Keyser Söze]

hilarious thread dude!

:bricks:

 

[Brock Samson]

I was going to make this exact thread, but then I thought it would be better to make a "Is this team better without an offensive line" thread, then I decided to have another beer.

 

[Kontradiction]

Hey sweet thread man!

 

[cmasspatsfan]

So you started a Is the team better off without Brady thread to tell us not to start any more is the team better off without player X' threads?

 

[blackglass3]

I think the internet might be better off without this website, the way things are going.

 

[Boston Boxer]

I mean he is Mr California now and has a supermodel wife and 2 kids to put up with now.

Or better off without Belichick? He's obviously more concerned with other people's wives than he is coaching football.

Or Wilfork? He obviously is more concerned with losing weight and admittedly starves himself rather than playing football. (Video - Vince Wilfork Interview on WEEI)

Or Welker? Obviously that new robo-knee can't hold up for long.

Or Brandon Spikes? He'd obviously rather put on a show for Chatroullete than focus on football.



Seriously, stop with the 'Is the team better off without player X' threads. Its causing me to go blind. :bricks:

the only thing that would have made this a better thread is if you named it "The OFFICIAL Is the team better off without Brady Thread?" I had to dock you points because you did not make it the "official" thread.

 

[IcyPatriot]

I mean he is Mr California now and has a supermodel wife and 2 kids to put up with now.

Or better off without Belichick? He's obviously more concerned with other people's wives than he is coaching football.

Or Wilfork? He obviously is more concerned with losing weight and admittedly starves himself rather than playing football. (Video - Vince Wilfork Interview on WEEI)

Or Welker? Obviously that new robo-knee can't hold up for long.

Or Brandon Spikes? He'd obviously rather put on a show for Chatroullete than focus on football.



Seriously, stop with the 'Is the team better off without player X' threads. Its causing me to go blind. :bricks:

so why did you make one then ... epic fail ... :bricks::bricks::bricks:

 

[reflexblue]

If they lose on Sunday, Monday this and Trade Brady thread will be very popular.

 

[Kontradiction]

If they lose on Sunday Monday this thread will have and Trade Brady will be at the top of the forum.

This is extremely confusing.

 

[reflexblue]

This is extremely confusing.

Well the threads with the most replies goes to the top of the forum page.

 

[Joker]

If these threads keep popping up I'm gonna change my handle to "refluxgreen"

 

[Kontradiction]

Well the threads with the most replies goes to the top of the forum page.

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

 

[Kontradiction]

If these threads keep popping up I'm gonna change my handle to "refluxgreen"

I was always partial to tampaxred myself.

 

[reflexblue]

If these threads keep popping up I'm gonna change my handle to "refluxgreen"

Hey i only started one, and i got my cue from the "Why isn't Brady Benched" and "Would the offense be better without Faulk' threads which were serious. I think they have pulled the forum out of that depressed state it was in.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Is this board better off without geniuses like Modest?

Uh huh! :rocker:

 

[pherein]

I mean he is Mr California now and has a supermodel wife and 2 kids to put up with now.

Or better off without Belichick? He's obviously more concerned with other people's wives than he is coaching football.

Or Wilfork? He obviously is more concerned with losing weight and admittedly starves himself rather than playing football. (Video - Vince Wilfork Interview on WEEI)

Or Welker? Obviously that new robo-knee can't hold up for long.

Or Brandon Spikes? He'd obviously rather put on a show for Chatroullete than focus on football.



Seriously, stop with the 'Is the team better off without player X' threads. Its causing me to go blind. :bricks:

The only thing in your post that makes sense is "Practice Squad"

 

[Joker]

Hey i only started one, and i got my cue from the "Why isn't Brady Benched" and "Would the offense be better without Faulk' threads which were serious. I think they have pulled the forum out of that depressed state it was in.

How about "Why Doesn't Faulk Smash Brady's Toes With A Clawhammer So He'll Have Company On The I.R.".......that way TWO topics are molded into ONE all important question...

 

[CheeseMonkeys]

Delete thread plz