Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,618
- Reaction score
- 22,468
re: Haynesworth sentencing & league response (merged)
You are basing your entire argument on the motivation of the prosecution to plea bargain.
Read what you said again, and look at it from Haynesworths prespective.
If he really didn't do it, but juries are unpredictable, and trials are expensive and time consuming, why wouldn't he plea bargain just to get it over with?
I'm pretty sure your response would be that there is some kind of dishonor in admitting you did something you didnt do, but we you really have no idea what Haynesworth's morality on that subject and whether he gives 2 cents about what people think about this are.
Just a bit of advice. If you are going to base everything on the motiviation of one side, you should consider applying similar motivation to the other side before believing it proves something.
I don't know or frankly care what happened, but for you to believe you can be certain what did is arrogant, unrealistic and clearly biased.
I'm not jumping in the middle of this nightmare, except to point out one thing.You must not pay much attention to the news, plea bargains are frequently offered in cases where there's good evidence to 1) save the government the expense of a trial and 2) because juries are sometimes unpredictable.
Turning around what you said, I don't think Albert would have accepted a plea bargain if he knew he was innocent.
You are basing your entire argument on the motivation of the prosecution to plea bargain.
Read what you said again, and look at it from Haynesworths prespective.
If he really didn't do it, but juries are unpredictable, and trials are expensive and time consuming, why wouldn't he plea bargain just to get it over with?
I'm pretty sure your response would be that there is some kind of dishonor in admitting you did something you didnt do, but we you really have no idea what Haynesworth's morality on that subject and whether he gives 2 cents about what people think about this are.
Just a bit of advice. If you are going to base everything on the motiviation of one side, you should consider applying similar motivation to the other side before believing it proves something.
I don't know or frankly care what happened, but for you to believe you can be certain what did is arrogant, unrealistic and clearly biased.











