- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 52,905
- Reaction score
- 33,917
We are talking about the 2104 defense. To me, each of the five represents significant value that needs to be replaced.
Personally, I think that it should short sighted to think that the loss of Wilfork and Kelly would be no big deal. IMHO, if that were to happen, we would sign one major free agent plus a high draft choice at DT.
You are also entitled to believe that we are better off with Harmon/Wilson than with Gregory/Harmon or Harmon/Gregory. I certainly disagree and think that we will now sign a free agent safety.
BOTTOM LINE
These players need to be replaced if they are not healthy. IMHO, to say that you would have replaced them anyway is somewhat beside the point. At least you didn't say that we have already replaced Wilfork and Kelly with Siliga and Jones.
I think that the DT spot needs to be upgraded whether Wilfork or Kelly come back. Never said otherwise. In fact, I said that in my post. I am just saying compared to last year. That is a position in need of an upgrade no matter what happens with Wilfork and Kelly. I am just not even considering them starters. Wilfork wasn't playing well before he was injured last year. And Kelly is at an age where he may never come back from injury.
I like Gregory, but I don't think his loss is a huge loss. The Pats may be worse at the position without him, but I don't think he was that big of a difference maker that his loss is huge catastrophe. I think he would have bee a solid back up if the Pats kept him.












