- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 505
- Reaction score
- 950
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Couple things:
Better way of saying it is some guy says it and everyone else in the thread rolls their eyes and says its stupid.
is kicking the dog, beating the wife next?They're in the denial stage. Anger is next.
These stats also don't account for the other team being the Falcons, a team that has historically defied the odds by finding a way to lose. The Falcons are like the Reverse Patriots. If anything, it was stunning the Falcons made it to the Super Bowl with the woeful coaching on display Sunday. Matt Ryan should have been better about taking sacks, but it wasn't like he played poorly. The Falcons just seemed out foxed intellectually at every turn towards the end of the game.99.6% odds of victory cannot be rounded to 100%.
Moreover, such an analysis assumes a NORMAL opponent, not the GOAT.
Honestly, the people saying the Pats dominated the game from start to finish are as stupid as these guys. The Falcons choked and the Pats took advantage. Not that complicated.
If you look at some of those holds and PI calls against Atlanta, they were blatant. That hold on Long was a choke hold for chrst sake. The PI on Bennett at the end was too obvious to not call.