This is without a doubt the most disgusting viewpoint ever expressed on this board.
To truly understand this, since this poster has a history of citing literal definitions of words, I went ot dictionary.com to make sure I understand what he is trying to say.
Here is the appropriate definition
without foundation in fact; imaginary; fictitious: The explanation was entirely mythical.
The other refer back to the definition of myth, which is:
any invented story, idea, or concept: His account of the event is pure myth.
4. an imaginary or fictitious thing or person.
5. an unproved or false collective belief that is used to justify a social institution.
So the poster is saying above that the moral duty to STOP DEFENSELESS CHILDREN FROM BEING MOLESTED AND RAPED BY A PREDATORY MONSTER is an invented concept and MORALLY THERE IS NO RESPONSIBILITY TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
That moral compass is pointed straight at the Jeffrey Dahmer pole.
Deus Irae, are you seriously telling me that in your set of morals if a man is anally raping a defenseless child your moral standards say it is a fallacy that you have a responsibility to do something to stop it?
Are you seriously defending the moral right of a grown man to rape a young defenseless boy?
This post literally made me vomit.