PatsRule
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Messages
- 296
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.PatsRule said:
James has taken exception to his name rarely, if ever, being mentioned among those priorities and told the paper he'll see who wants his services when the free agent signing period opens March 3.
"Maybe I'll get to a situation where somebody appreciates me," James told the Star. "I'm going to always be a ballplayer. You know I've got game. You can't knock what I do.
THAT is a big question,,,a large important one!!edzo44 said:So the question would be "How does he get appreciation??"
For James, is it appreciation if you bust your butt with solid teamwork and get a ring?
Or is appreciation all about the money and no chance at a ring??
mcdonut16 said:Contrary to popular pundit opinion, Edge is the guy that makes that whole Offense tick, not Manning. Check out Manning's stats the year that Edge blew out his knee.
I love it. If the Colts don't resign him they are toast. Edge has been looking to get out of Indy for years, and I'll bet part of it is to get as far away from Manning as possible. He knows they are never going to win the whole thing.
"At the end of the day I can say I did my part," James told the paper. "I did what they asked me to do. At the end of the day the truth will be seen and everybody will see what kind of player I am and how important of a player I am.
"For somebody else to come in and do what I did, it would be tough. Look at the difference when I'm there and when I'm not there. That's all you got to do."
I would love to bring Edge to the Patriots. He's definately got 2-3 years left in the tank.
AndyJohnson said:I see the future of the Colts VERY clearly.
The slide is starting. But they will remain competitive, and disappointing.
Dungy is going to build a clone of his Tampa defenses. They will be pretty good defenses, but will lack big game qualities, i.e. they will excite people with sacks numbers and statistics, but will be undersized and wear down throughout the season, and be unable to come up big in playoff games.
The offense will also evolve into a Dungy-esque offense. Manning will lose weapons, starting with James. Losing the running game, and the playaction will expose the offense, and Manning will be an underachiever. The OL will not be a priority and also deteriorate. If they do keep Wayne, soon Harrisons age will reduce his effectiveness, and the deep talented WR corps will be reduced to average.
The Colts will spend 5-7 years as playoff contenders, with an imporving D, (that never becomes good enough to win in the playoffs) and a deteriorating O. Manning goes from the guy that couldnt win because of his defnese to the guy 'carrying a weak offense'.
Neither Dungy or Manning ever win a Championship, and they fall into the category of teams that underachieved.
Too much to even think about lookin' at Edge.workhorse said:I don't think that the Pats are willing to fork out the chunk of change that it will take to get him. How much do they have wrapped up in Dillon?
Marvin's one of the best, no doubt. In the regular season. But honestly, doesn't he seem to you to dissapear for long stretches once the play-offs hit?workhorse said:Polian has already said they need to address their O line, so saying it's not a priority would be a mistake. I'm not sure were you arguement is with the receivers. The Colts have said Reggie will be resigned, but I don't see how the receivers will "be reduced to average" simply by Marvin getting older. Marvin may be getting older, but his game is far from slipping.
MoLewisrocks said:Polian has a little cache with that fan base where RB is concerned because he traded Marshall Faulk and survived because it was for Edgerrin James. Those who are not already becoming disenchanted assume he will just find a younger cheaper Edge.
Polian has seemed in the last week or so to have been throwing Edge and the Oline under the bus. He said recently they needed a RB who could do his own blocking! This about a guy who has been a fantastic pass blocker and receiver out of the backfield. Fans in Indy assume it's either his exit strategy for not resigning a player he can't afford or his attempt to blunt Edge's market (Polian could work for the Sox).
That entire organization has the excuse mentality firmly imbedded and it starts at the very top. The only player Polian will not blame ever is of course his $98M man. The Colts need a power running game for the post season, but the only reason they don't have it is because they won't dedicate to it. It's not a personnel decision so much as a scheme choice. Polamalu is right that they are one dimentional (when it comes to crunch time) even though the seasonal stats would seem to bely that. They ran early and often through the cupcake schedule, but as usual abandoned the run earlier and earlier as the season progressed. This proves very misfortunate because his franchise QB turns into a frog and his franchise WR disappears every year in that all important last game.
Dungy won't last long enough to make many more significant improvements in that D either. His desire to get out and his desire to go out a winner are at critical odds. One more disappointing season and he's toast probably by mutual choice.
Unfortunately James and Dillon aren't really a viable combo because of the cost factor and the timing (not to mention Faulk's contract). Too much money to tie up in the running game, and without a better run blocking line James would under perform here too. Because contrary to what Polian and Manning are saying, that's been an exceptional line who was just hung out to dry by their coaches (game planning in the wake of the SD blueprint) and Mr. Audibles failure to adapt or execute in the crunch per usual. Provided the CBA gets done Edge will find a home this time around though because Polian just can't afford to franchise him again with $19M in bonuses due to Manning and Harrison alone, not to mention a handful of starter FA he has to re-sign.
T-ShirtDynasty said:Too much to even think about lookin' at Edge.
Marvin's one of the best, no doubt. In the regular season. But honestly, doesn't he seem to you to dissapear for long stretches once the play-offs hit?
workhorse said:I think more than Marvin disappearing, other guys aren't stepping up. Marvin is still the number one weapon in the passing game, that may change, but it hasn't yet. As a result, teams really key on him in the playoffs more than in the regular season. The other guys on offense need to step their games up a bit to take advantage of this and make it so teams can't focus on Marvin without getting burned.
workhorse said:First Edge hasn't been trying to get out of Indy. Edge has been wanted a big deal with some years on it. He doesn't like living in the cold, being from Florida, but he enjoys/enjoyed playing for the Colts. Second, how much money do you think it would take to sign Edge? He wants a 4 or 5 year deal. If the new CBA get worked out, the Colts will resign him, but if it doesn't he's probably gone. I don't think that the Pats are willing to fork out the chunk of change that it will take to get him. How much do they have wrapped up in Dillon?
Polian has already said they need to address their O line, so saying it's not a priority would be a mistake. I'm not sure were you arguement is with the receivers. The Colts have said Reggie will be resigned, but I don't see how the receivers will "be reduced to average" simply by Marvin getting older. Marvin may be getting older, but his game is far from slipping. I' don't know how you can say that the Colts D will never become good enough. Did you see the turn around that they have made in the last two seasons? They are young and improving. I know most here hate the Colts, but don't let that hatred blind you.
AzPatsFan said:What AJ is saying is the premise of the Dungy defense is fundamentally flawed. Small quick players can build a "downhill" defense that makes them look awesome when playing the chumps of the League. The Offense jumps out to a three score lead, and the opponents then abandon a working running game to play catchup.
This does NOT happen against playoff caliber clubs; They are too good to fall behind by three scores and their running games are never abandoned. They just rush the Colts intot the ground and win going away as the phoney defense is exposed and gets worn down.
Plus it is very difficult to create an overwhelming Offense for very long. You can do it for only a few years at most. An overwhelming Offense is unstoppable; that requires all the skill players on O to be at the top of their game. When any chink in the armor appears, be it age, inury, a FA departure, the Offense recedes to being merely very good. Then it can't do its part and can't jump out to three score leads reliably. When it doesn't the whole defense starts to fall apart because fundamentally they cannot stop the run against them. It just snowballs.
That's why a Tampa can go from a league leading D to a losing record when the Offense receded just a little bit. Ditto for the Rams.
workhorse said:You seem to forget that the Tampa team that won the Super Bowl was still Tony's team, just one year removed. They hadn't made any drastic changes, they just opened the offense up a bit. Tampa's problems weren't due to it's offense receeding, they never really had an offense. Their problems were due to Gruden putting his mark on the team and it not working out.
To say that the Colts defense won't work against playoff teams is incorrect. The Colts faced every AFC playoff team outside of Denver this season and they were 5-0 in those games, including handing it to the same Steelers that beat them in the playoffs.
mcdonut16 said:Dude your logic is so bent around Dungy it's ridiculous. The Bucs were picked to win the Superbowl for like 3 years in a row by all the pundits, and Dungy couldn't get it done. Do you think it was a coincidence that they won the Superbowl the year after Dungy left Tampa ? Thats right the Bucs won the Superbowl with basically the same exact team that Dungy had. Have you asked yourself why Gruden won and Dungy didn't.
The difference ? Gruden is flat out a better X's O's coach and was better at game time adjustments. The reason the Buc's declined after that first Superbowl win, was that Sapp and Lynch got old. By the time Gruden got his hands on the Bucs, alot of the best players were over the hill, not because of the mark he put on the team. The Bucs could have and should have won more than 1 Superbowl during their time at the top.
Now fast forward to the present day colts. History repeats itself again. The pundits have once again picked another Dungy team to win the Superbowl the last 3 years in a row. This year everything was setup for them and they still couldn't get it done.
Dungy is a very good coach, and is one of the top 10 coaches in the league, but I say there is that one missing ingredient that does not allow his teams to get over the hump. I say that ingredient is game time adjustments and decisions.
One more coincidence for you, I suppose it wasn't Mannings fault at Tennessee that they just happened to win the National Title the year after he left either. Was that still Manning's team, or was it the great Tee Martin's team ?
| 4 | 462 |
| 2 | 686 |
| 33 | 3K |
| 81 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











