Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hard to tell if this is a tease based on something he knows or speculation.
The same five I posted in another thread....Branch? Patten? Holt? Aiken? Washington?
I always have wanted Branch back. He has showed some life the past couple of weeks in Seattle, but they would probably part with him. Wishful thinking, likely.
I dont want Branch.I think he has lost a step.
San Diego. Discovered by the Germans in 1904. They named it San Diago. Which of course in German means "a whale's vagina".
I like Branch but people need to realize he is not going to be the same player he was when he was with us. If he comes in I'd make him the 4th receiver behind Tate, Welker and Edelman.
I take it you didn't watch the San Diego game.
San Diego. Discovered by the Germans in 1904. They named it San Diago. Which of course in German means "a whale's vagina".
Bolt could probably run better routes then Tate.
San Diego. Discovered by the Germans in 1904. They named it San Diago. Which of course in German means "a whale's vagina".
Just mark this down as just another dumb move by the Pats if this happens.
I bet they trade a 3rd rounder for Branch.
Yes, your right, we are gonna draft/sign 2 1's, 2 2's, 2 3's and 2 's next year so the pick is absolutely crucial for the future of the team. Even if they aggressively package picks for future years, they still have an abundance of draft picks and unlike dollar bills, there is such a thing as "too many" low picks in "salary cap" sport.
We're kind close to that.
This really wouldn't shock me.If that happens, I'm flying to KC tonight, getting on my knees, and begging Scott Pioli to come back.
| 7 | 339 |
| 5 | 1K |
| 10 | 734 |
| 13 | 2K |
| 7 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











