pheenix11
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 5,151
- Reaction score
- 4,777
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Boy I'm glad you're not the GM. A 3rd is a valuable commodity to use to either trade one of our 1sts or 2nd UP for a top pick or to trade forward for a 2nd in 2012.
Sure it's a valuable commodity, but it's also one that can be used as a throw-away (not literally, but they don't need it, and have to do something with it).
Doesn't have to be a straight up either. Twig and 5th or 6th for a 3rd. I didn't necessarily mean straight up. My point was the 3rd was secondary to the trade with Randy cuz he had to go.
This isn't going to happen. We are not going to get another WR.
This is BB's way of telling his young receivers: "I have faith in you. I think you guys can get it done."
By getting another WR and one that could be washed up, he would be sending a message to his young corp that he doesn't really have faith in them.
Why would that be? I don't get it? He shot his way out of town and we are roasting Moss? We give up on a HOF receiver that made the rest of our WR core better for a return to yesteryear? Do that Pats fans have short memories? Do we need another midget WR? Do we want someone who has been slowed by injuries and will cost us $5m and is 31 years old? Does anyone here think Branch will stretch the field for Welker and our TE? Probably not.Listening to WEEI, they are saying rumor is Branch is coming back. That would be
Tree
Men
Does
This isn't going to happen. We are not going to get another WR.
This is BB's way of telling his young receivers: "I have faith in you. I think you guys can get it done."
By getting another WR and one that could be washed up, he would be sending a message to his young corp that he doesn't really have faith in them.
The idea that they don't need it so it shouldn't be valued is ridiculous.
The only way to fix this is Jackson. Surprise...he is a diva too. Look, he wants a new contract. Pay the man and make stipulations where it cost him 75% of his salary with his next screw up. He'll walk the line if it cost him $6m.
Someone twitted Mankins and one of our seconds for Calvin Johnson......has our FO got enough balls to do that one? Yes I know Mankins has to sign his tender, but we hold his rights. Not a bad trade for either Team. One Young Pro-bowler for another plus a second. Detroit would have it's best lineman in Mankins. Buffalo for Evans would work as well. Both Teams are in trouble.
DW Toys
Reason alone for the death penalty for the inventor of Twitter
I almost hope we don't sign him so I can go "DAMNIT!!"
This isn't going to happen. We are not going to get another WR.
This is BB's way of telling his young receivers: "I have faith in you. I think you guys can get it done."
By getting another WR and one that could be washed up, he would be sending a message to his young corp that he doesn't really have faith in them.
News Flash fellow Pats fans: Deion Branch isn't that good.
| 7 | 338 |
| 5 | 1K |
| 10 | 730 |
| 13 | 2K |
| 7 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











