Kontradiction
On my retirement tour.
PatsFans.com Supporter
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 68,279
- Reaction score
- 76,724
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Bullshít Kontra. The calls/non-calls played a big part in deciding the outcome of game 2. They have an affect. Whether or not they are worthy of doing so is open for discussion.Calls have very little to do with it, as they have in the first two games. Heat have no energy and no production from anybody not named LeBron. C's are getting. Contributions from everyone. The Heat could help themselves in spite of the calls but they're not. 2-1.
Bullshít Kontra. The calls/non-calls played a big part in deciding the outcome of game 2. They have an affect. Whether or not they are worthy of doing so is open for discussion.
Heat have finally brought some intensity. Set up for an interesting final 5.
If they hadn't of allowed that, the call would have been a non issue.
I haven't said there weren't other issues that affected game 2 because there were. The calls/non-calls were a factor in deciding the outcome of the game. The fact that you aren't able to recognise that is your problem.No they didn't. The C's allowing a 12-0 run after having their foot on Miami's throat played a big part. If they hadn't of allowed that, the call would have been a non issue.
I haven't said there weren't other issues that affected game 2 because there were. The calls/non-calls were a factor in deciding the outcome of the game. The fact that you aren't able to recognise that is your problem.
The issue is the calls/non-calls did affect the game just as much as the Celtics want to take perimeter shots and lack of inside presence. How it's debatable is obviously beyond my method of understanding.Opposing teams fans have homer glasses on..Miami fans do..as well as Boston fans.
If the same thing happened to Miami..he would be saying the same thing we are saying...just how it is in sports
Why did the C's just give up? This is the one thing that they always do..get a big lead..then say..we won..and stop playing
I haven't said there weren't other issues that affected game 2 because there were. The calls/non-calls were a factor in deciding the outcome of the game. The fact that you aren't able to recognise that is your problem.
The issue is the calls/non-calls did affect the game just as much as the Celtics want to take perimeter shots and lack of inside presence. How it's debatable is obviously beyond my method of understanding.
As for the Celtics. They should win this but it's shown once again that as soon as Miami goes uptempo they find it difficult to match their athleticism.
Opposing teams fans have homer glasses on..Miami fans do..as well as Boston fans.
If the same thing happened to Miami..he would be saying the same thing we are saying...just how it is in sports
Why did the C's just give up? This is the one thing that they always do..get a big lead..then say..we won..and stop playing
Actually, the same thing did happen tonight.
No tie game tonight down the stretch with a no call tonight..so really the same thing didn't happen...at all
That's not a good enough explanation Kontra. When the potential for personnel on the floor is affected by the decisions referees make whether deserved or undeserved that affects the outcome of the game. The level to which that affects the game is a point for topical discussion.Actually the problem is that your argument is solely based on a "who knows?" perspective, as I stated earlier. Who is to say that the other events wouldn't have transpired still, with the Heat winning by three instead of five? The "who knows" arguments are so fun!
Anyway, C's win. 2-1 with Game 4 on Sunday. I expect contributions from anyone else not wearing #6 on their jersies.
Sure it did. The calls went the C's way tonight just as they went the Heat's way in Game 2. The only difference is that Miami sh!t the bed in the second half even worse than the C's did in the third quarter of Game 2 so they weren't in the position for a no call like what happened in Game 2.
That's not a good enough explanation Kontra. When the potential for personnel on the floor is affected by the decisions referees make whether deserved or undeserved that affects the outcome of the game. The level to which that affects the game is a point for topical discussion.
As for the secondary points about team performance and execution on the floor, you've had and will get no argument because we are in agreement.
Right..but it wasn't like game two with a tie game in OT with 2 min to go where any call can change the outcome. The calls should have went the C's way tonight. Home teams always get the favorable calls..there just wasn't that drastic call like game 2..that's all
| 317 | 9K |
| 207 | 14K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)









