Nunchucks
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2007
- Messages
- 10,479
- Reaction score
- 8,582
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.We can go the route China did and just shoot the sick. That might help.Life is gonna be sucking for quite some time
How long should Americans expect to live like this — separated from friends, coworkers and classmates? Experts say they don’t know. - The Boston Globe
The one positive thing about being in the US right now is that in most places the population density is low. People also use cars and are less dependent on public transportation. This inherently reduces the level of social contact and reduces the chances of mass infection at various hotspots such as trains/buses/markets. This advantage may be less relevant in places like NYC though and the administration's bungling ways may have nullified it anyway. A lot of us are going to get this disease, let's hope that the curve does start flattening out due to the common people's vigilance.
Pick up and delivery only. Doesnt help servers and bartenders. Not sure destroying the economy is the best solution for this.
the ******ed public and the people/scientists who were on the airwaves spouting off about how it is no big deal.
Maybe on fox news?There were scientists saying it was no big deal?
That's the choice, save some lives or kill the economyPick up and delivery only. Doesnt help servers and bartenders. Not sure destroying the economy is the best solution for this.
People here are blaming Trump more than the real culprits - the Chinese government. The likely cause of the coronavirus was China's unsanitary meat markets, which are sanctioned by their government. Didn't it create SARs too?
I don't necessarily support all of these large scale interventions from the Fed (for different reasons than yours) but you are greatly underestimating the importance of the repo market. The run on the repo market was one of the biggest contributing factors for the downturn in 2008. It's how financial institutions get cash and leverage the huge sums they have invested in other assets. It's gigantic market with a volume of several trillion dollars on average per day.
Also, the Federal Reserve is in a position to make money off these loans. If the banks cannot repay these loans, the Federal Reserve gets to keep the securities and earn a huge return. Even if the banks pay them back, it will make a profit since it will charge interest on the loan.
They've also introduced a round of $700 billion worth of quantitative easing, similar to what they did after the 2008 recession.
Just heard that, they're going to have to cut corners and fast track it.In case anyone missed it, Dr. Fauci did confirm a potential vaccine is in testing.
However it started today, and the timeline is 1 year in order to get through testing.
So at best we're looking at a year if it works and is deemed safe.
Then it'll have to be mass produced.
Maybe on fox news?
Good idea in principle, but I’d rather have it as vouchers/food stamps for all and reimbursements or vouchers for basic necessities like rent or mortgage. The idea of writing a 1,000 check to cash is a terrible idea, and children shouldn’t be punished for parents/guardians being irresponsible. They hesitated to shut down the schools in California because millions of kids depend on schools to eat. When I asked why they can’t just subsidized it though money, I was told because the money/food would,never get to the kids.
We can go the route China did and just shoot the sick. That might help.
Just heard that, they're going to have to cut corners and fast track it.
Just heard that, they're going to have to cut corners and fast track it.
Or shoot the dumb.
There are three ways I'm aware of to "fast track" it. One is to not do as much safety testing, which is pretty scary. The last thing we need in this country is a vaccine recall after a rash of bad reactions.
The second is to begin manufacture before the safety testing is done, on the assumption that the testing is going to come out OK. That's just a financial risk, which in this case is probably inconsequential to the larger goal.
The third way is to push computer modeling ahead of some of the traditional animal testing, which from what my biotech connections have told me, is a decade overdue, but hard to accomplish in a "business as usual" context because nobody wants to be associated with the risk.
Note: I could very well be inaccurate or incomplete in this analysis.
| 27 | 2K |
| 15 | 925 |
| 22 | 1K |
| 18 | 2K |
| 15 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











