Bad Company
Rookie
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2004
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 40
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I really think you need to explain that just a little bit more. Maybe there was supposed to be a link.Civil Fraud may be the best path to resolve deflategate. This places a greater burden on the NFL and doesn't open Brady up to the same risks.
Enjoy the discussion.
"Dude, Civil Fraud, BOOM!"
"What? Explain yourself..."
"YOU explain myself. Peace out!"
It may be subjective, but there is absolutely no doubt his reputation has been harmed.Brady cannot show he was materially harmed. He did not lose endorsements, His jersey is the number one seller (although my cynical mind has me believing the NFL is jacking up the sales of his jerseys so Brady cannot use a decrease in jersey sales as harm. Someone should check Goodell's garage for them.). His reputation being impacted is subjective.
You sure? I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that he lost endorsements over this.Brady cannot show he was materially harmed. He did not lose endorsements, His jersey is the number one seller (although my cynical mind has me believing the NFL is jacking up the sales of his jerseys so Brady cannot use a decrease in jersey sales as harm. Someone should check Goodell's garage for them.). His reputation being impacted is subjective.
It may be subjective, but there is absolutely no doubt his reputation has been harmed.
Brady cannot show he was materially harmed. He did not lose endorsements, His jersey is the number one seller (although my cynical mind has me believing the NFL is jacking up the sales of his jerseys so Brady cannot use a decrease in jersey sales as harm. Someone should check Goodell's garage for them.). His reputation being impacted is subjective.