- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 18,034
- Reaction score
- 9,338
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You forgot the sarcasm icon.Bengals might have better depth at WR then we do. I guess they REALLY needed a kick returner. Tate certainly isn't bad at it.
I think they very likely have the worse WR corps in the NFL.I like Simpson
Gresham will break out at anytime now...
they certainly have 1 ofr best receiving corps in the league. Yes I count Gresham the TE
edit do they Have TO still?
I think they very likely have the worse WR corps in the NFL.
A rookie and a bunch of nothing.
Your boy simpson has been in the league 3 years and has caught 21 passes
You called them one of the best receiving corps in the NFL??????????he is not my boy... he made very good plays last year in the games that I saw.
I'd take our bunch over theirs any day AJ
You called them one of the best receiving corps in the NFL??????????
I don't see anything close to a #1 and frankly not even a decent #2.
What team has a worse WR corps?
Philly has best WR corps and that is quite obvious
These are your wordsnooo I didn't I put 1 of the best. did i make typo?
I am counting Green FYI even though Julio is better
I think Jermaine Gresham is a player that will break out and I factored in a healthy TO
Philly has best WR corps and that is quite obvious
they certainly have 1 ofr best receiving corps in the league.
I dont agree with that either, especially the 'obvious' partPhilly has best WR corps and that is quite obvious
| 10 | 2K |
| 13 | 4K |
| 4 | 385 |
| 11 | 593 |
| 12 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 6 - June 21 (Through 26yrs)











