- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 43,429
- Reaction score
- 21,618
It seems as if Bourne will be ready for camp, probably limited. They could keep him eligible for PUP, but I don't see him being sidelined for that long. We re-signed him expecting him to play. Of course, he could be placed on IR during camp.
Personally, I expect Bourne to be on the 53-man roster to start the season. We'll like carry 5 WR's. There should be no issue with Bourne being inactive for a couple of weeks or longer. With Gibson being able to line up as a WR, I could see us sometimes activating only 3 WR's, especially if we can sign a RB.
THE FOUR IN ADDITION TO BOURNE
Douglas, Osborne, Polk, Baker
OPTIONS FOR A POSSIBLE #6 (I'd rather carry an additional RB)
Shuster (no cost insurance; actually, we save $2M in 2024 cap money)
Thornton
Reagor
AN ASIDE
If a healthy Shuster is really our #2 or #3, we could decide to keep him this year and possibly next. I would think that we would then trade Osborne. We don't need more for 2025 than Douglas, Bourne, Polk, Baker and a healthy Shuster. (For me, Thornton is a better #6 than Osborne).
I expect that Osborne was brought in to replace Shuster, full stop. If Shuster looks good in camp, some team will trade for him (with the cap savings available in 2025).
Personally, I expect Bourne to be on the 53-man roster to start the season. We'll like carry 5 WR's. There should be no issue with Bourne being inactive for a couple of weeks or longer. With Gibson being able to line up as a WR, I could see us sometimes activating only 3 WR's, especially if we can sign a RB.
THE FOUR IN ADDITION TO BOURNE
Douglas, Osborne, Polk, Baker
OPTIONS FOR A POSSIBLE #6 (I'd rather carry an additional RB)
Shuster (no cost insurance; actually, we save $2M in 2024 cap money)
Thornton
Reagor
AN ASIDE
If a healthy Shuster is really our #2 or #3, we could decide to keep him this year and possibly next. I would think that we would then trade Osborne. We don't need more for 2025 than Douglas, Bourne, Polk, Baker and a healthy Shuster. (For me, Thornton is a better #6 than Osborne).
I expect that Osborne was brought in to replace Shuster, full stop. If Shuster looks good in camp, some team will trade for him (with the cap savings available in 2025).
Last edited:












