- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 35,696
- Reaction score
- 7,798
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The last line of the TE section shocks me. "Don't let the lack of blocking ability eliminate a good player."
We haven't had many TE's in Name Only types on this team. Tim Wright is the only one that comes to mind as a good receiver/poor blocker TE. I know the TE section delineates a #1 TE that's a receiving threat and #2 and #3 TEs who are more situational blockers, but I would've expected the opposite note given the team's history with TEs.
The last line of the TE section shocks me. "Don't let the lack of blocking ability eliminate a good player."
We haven't had many TE's in Name Only types on this team. Tim Wright is the only one that comes to mind as a good receiver/poor blocker TE. I know the TE section delineates a #1 TE that's a receiving threat and #2 and #3 TEs who are more situational blockers, but I would've expected the opposite note given the team's history with TEs.