I think it’s important to understand there are different philosophies to developing a QB.
One is get him on the field and get him experience. Let him make mistakes and learn from them, while the bullets are flying. You aren’t learning that by watching and you aren’t learning that in practice. This can be hard to do on many teams because you are accepting that the most important player will be mistake prone and sacrificing today to build for the future. If your team stinks it’s easier to do. If you other QB stinks, it’s crazy not to play the kid.
Another is to wait until he has a better chance of playing well. IF he is the right guy, he will get better every week. Even if he isn’t playing he will absorb knowledge, practice technique and know the playbook better. However, if you are also playing in Sundays you get all of that PLUS on field experience and your development accelerates. Put another way, Drake Maye will be better next September than he is today. So if you don’t play him he will develop to some degree and by the time you put him on the forks he will be better than if you played him early. But, Drake Maye will better next September if he plays this year than he will be if he does not. And the more he plays, the bigger the difference.
This is the dichotomy of the topic. It is both true that if you sit him he will be better when he eventually plays, and that if you play him he will be better at that same point than if he sat. If he isn’t “ready” playing accelerates his readiness. If he has things to work on, or “bad habits” addressing them in live action rather than scout teams reps is a better way to fix them.
If your team has a chance to win sitting the rookie is valid. If your team really has no chance to win, and ultimately developing the young QB is the only real chance you do have to win, it is negligent to give those developmental reps to a slug like Brissett.
Tom Brady endorses sitting him. Because Tom Brady knows he played better in 2001 than he would have in 2000 so it seems the best thing for the QB isn’t wait until he will play better and is better prepared before he plays. But I have zero doubt if Brady was asked if he played in 2000 would he have been better when he played in 2001 from the experience he would agree. And the goal here isn’t 2024 it’s 2025 and beyond.
The interesting side effect of the ol and offense in general stinking is that it gives Maye and opportunity to learn to play under adversity.
What made Tom Brady the GOAT wasn’t what he did in first and 10 with a perfect pocket and Moss and Welker wide open. It wasn’t the stats he put up in blowouts. Many QBs put up lofty stats.
What made Brady the GOAT was that more often than anyone who has ever played the game when the **** hit the fan, when you couldn’t run the ball to save your life, when the OL was getting dominated, when the D was getting torched Brady out the team on his back. This is exactly the experience a QB gains when the team around him is bad, bad things that he has to overcome happen more often. The second difference with Brady was not turning the ball over. When do turnovers happen? Under pressure, under duress, when the other 10 on offense break down. Brady had the incredible ability to prevent that from resulting in a turnover. Having your young QB learn in a situation where that pressure happens often accelerates that development. Mac Jones got drafted in round 1 based upon his play when there rarely was any adversity. First read was open all the time, pass blocking was great.
When he came to the NFL he never learned how to deal with pressure and adversity. He had a good rookie year because McDaniels ran a scheme that made him make only quick short low risk throws. Once defenses started making him deal with adversity he was done. The last month of 2021 was the end and he just spiraled through 2 seasons. We learned he just isn’t an NFL QB
We gs e an opportunity to give Maye a bunch of reps under a high rate of pressure and adversity to gain experience in the most vital aspect of QB success and we are passing up that opportunity.