Silver Blue&Red
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2010
- Messages
- 6,983
- Reaction score
- 4,905
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Of course not, but that is the criterion we are discussing.Well winning isn’t the only way to judge somebody in a team sport.
Of course not, but that is the criterion we are discussing.
This is moronic.So Tom Brady was only worse at winning in those years, not a worse overall player
This is moronic.
We are talking about the aspect of winning in judging a qb.
IN THAT RESPECT a qb who loses his first playoff game compares unfavorably to one who wins 2 then loses in the Sb.
A QBs who wins 8 conference championships and 5 SBs is better in that respect that one who wins 4 conf championships and can’t get that far the other 4 times and wins 4 sbs. In fact he is better than one who wins 5 conf championships and fails to get there 3 other times but wins all 5 sbs.
A loss after advancing further is not worse than a loss prior to advancing that far.
It’s really simple.
As I said that is a stupid question and is not pertinent to the discussion.All I’m asking is if for example, joe Flacco was a better player in 2012 than Tom brady, or Ben roethlisberger In 2005
It’s just being worse than the guy who got there regardless of whether he wins or loses.
As I said that is a stupid question and is not pertinent to the discussion.
The 2 losses to the giants were more on the defense unable to contain Eli and his receivers in the last moments of the game, than on Brady.
This is moronic.
We are talking about the aspect of winning in judging a qb.
IN THAT RESPECT a qb who loses his first playoff game compares unfavorably to one who wins 2 then loses in the Sb.
A QBs who wins 8 conference championships and 5 SBs is better in that respect that one who wins 4 conf championships and can’t get that far the other 4 times and wins 4 sbs. In fact he is better than one who wins 5 conf championships and fails to get there 3 other times but wins all 5 sbs.
A loss after advancing further is not worse than a loss prior to advancing that far.
It’s really simple.
And I answered that multiple times.It’s not stupid because of that first quote. I was Looking for clarification on that
And I answered that multiple times.
You just want to play games. Not interested.
Oh God, please. LeBron constantly choked and ALWAYS switched teams whenever there was a legit opponent to challenge Lebron's all-star team.
Never compare Brady to LeBron.
The 2 losses to the giants were more on the defense unable to contain Eli and his receivers in the last moments of the game, than on Brady.
Disagree. The greatest offense in NFL history scored two TD's in the SB. That's flat out not acceptable. Sure, Brady hit Moss with 2:30 left to go ahead by four. But that was one of McD's worst ever game in terms of play calling. The team would not run Maroney. They kept trying to go for the home run pass. It was beyond logic. The defense had manning sacked for a huge loss on 3rd down. Yet the officials missed blatant holding on the Giants OL. That led to a once in a lifetime miracle catch. The game was virtually over after the Tyree catch. Everyone knows it.
SB 46 has a terrible D going in. They held the giants to 14 points until there was a few minutes left in the game. They did their job. The offense went nearly the entire 2nd half without scoring a TD.