PostGame Thread 2024 OFFICIAL POSTGAME: Pats lose to the Jags 32-16, fall to 1-6

[Ring 6]

They didn't have the time. If you're arguing they did then unfortunately you're wrong. You saw it play out.

They had time, they just didn’t stop anyone. No scenario gets them a win the way they played.
My way increased the chances if they got their heads out of their asses.

 

[festy1986]

It changed because they missed and since they weren’t getting the 2 it’s good for them that they knew.
You are still arguing they couldn’t convert the 2 but should have played like they could.

You're arguing that because Polk dropped the ball he would of dropped it in the second time.

Are you not? It that not what you meant when you said you would taking the same play on the second time that they ran on the first time had they chose to kick the PAT instead?

 

[festy1986]

They had time, they just didn’t stop anyone. No scenario gets them a win the way they played.
My way increased the chances if they got their heads out of their asses.

So they had time to score a TD and FG regardless of if they took the PAT vs 2 points conversion.

Great. We finally agree they had time to score multiple times then.

 

[BobDigital]

Sadly if rebuilds were easy every team would do them. You can't just draft high, you need to draft well.

We need a great draft. Particularly at the WR spot. We need to hit on oline in the mid rounds like we use to. We also need to make some good free agents signings and get a good coach in here.

The one bright spot to this is if Maye can continue to show he can be the guy if you put pieces around him, that makes all our top coaching and GM spots look like good options.

 

[Ring 6]

My way doesn't prevent any of that. You haven't proved it one bit.

My way still allows for the TD and FG to happen and your argument that it doesn't is only because you don't want it to.

You don’t watch much football do you?

Are you seriously telling me teams down 8 with 9 minutes left approach those 9 minutes the same way as when they are down 9? You’ve argued the opposite

 

[Ring 6]

So they had time to score a TD and FG regardless of if they took the PAT vs 2 points conversion.

Great. We finally agree they had time to score multiple times then.

Which is why it’s important that they know they have to score multiple times

 

[festy1986]

You don’t watch much football do you?

Are you seriously telling me teams down 8 with 9 minutes left approach those 9 minutes the same way as when they are down 9? You’ve argued the opposite

So instead of attacking the argument you attack the person.

That's called Ad Hominem. I've ended this debate with logic so you took a different route in your argument. That's sad.

 

[festy1986]

Which is why it’s important that they know they have to score multiple times

Why? Did you look into your crystal ball and seen that they missed the 2 point conversion?

 

[festy1986]

Which is why it’s important that they know they have to score multiple times

Why? Did you look into your crystal ball and seen that they missed the 2 point conversion

Which is why it’s important that they know they have to score multiple times

They didn't have to if they chose to kick the PAT

 

[Ring 6]

You're arguing that because Polk dropped the ball he would of dropped it in the second time.

Are you not? It that not what you meant when you said you would taking the same play on the second time that they ran on the first time had they chose to kick the PAT instead?

They had a choice to run the 2 point conversion the first time or the second time.
You can’t discuss which is a better choice without accepting the result would be the same.

 

[Ring 6]

Why? Did you look into your crystal ball and seen that they missed the 2 point conversion?

So your argument of whether it’s better to go for 2 on the first score or the second is that you get to decide if they make it or not?

We are talking about the decision

 

[festy1986]

They had a choice to run the 2 point conversion the first time or the second time.
You can’t discuss which is a better choice without accepting the result would be the same.

I'm still wondering how you know the results would be the same.

What kind of witchcraft do you practice to know that?

And to say it with such confidence and zero ounce of irony is hilarious to me.

 

[Ring 6]

Why? Did you look into your crystal ball and seen that they missed the 2 point conversion


They didn't have to if they chose to kick the PAT

When they went for 2 they missed so they weren’t getting 15 points out of 2 TDs

 

[festy1986]

So your argument of whether it’s better to go for 2 on the first score or the second is that you get to decide if they make it or not?

We are talking about the decision

My argument is clear. You don't know what happens if they go for it with a minute left.

We know what happens when they did it your way.

 

[festy1986]

When they went for 2 they missed so they weren’t getting 15 points out of 2 TDs

And now you know why you don't go for it on the first TD.

 

[Ring 6]

I'm still wondering how you know the results would be the same.

What kind of witchcraft do you practice to know that?

And to say it with such confidence and zero ounce of irony is hilarious to me.

Ok I’m done.
I can’t bang my head against a wall any longer.

You can’t discuss which decision is right and change the result of the play to make yours sound better.
It’s like saying we should have run the ball every play because how do you know we wouldn’t have gained 500 yards, so therefore running every play is better.

 

[festy1986]

Ok I’m done.
I can’t bang my head against a wall any longer.

You can’t discuss which decision is right and change the result of the play to make yours sound better.
It’s like saying we should have run the ball every play because how do you know we wouldn’t have gained 500 yards, so therefore running every play is better.

I've not changed anything. I said from the start your way was wrong.

We know it's wrong because we saw it enacted.

It. Didn't. Work.

 

[Ring 6]

And now you know why you don't go for it on the first TD.

They did the right thing. It’s not really even debatable if you don’t make up stuff

 

[festy1986]

They did the right thing. It’s not really even debatable if you don’t make up stuff

If they did the right thing then where was the two possessions needed to fix the mistake made on the 2 pointer?

 

[Ring 6]

I've not changed anything. I said from the start your way was wrong.

We know it's wrong because we saw it enacted.

It. Didn't. Work.

Hahahaha
So when you get ***** slapped that’s proof that everything you did that day was wrong?
I guess they should have played Brissett because we tried playing Maye and we lost. It didn’t work. You can’t tell me brissett wouldn’t have thrown for 500 yards