SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I heard a radio interview with Chris Sims the other day, maybe on the Dan Patrick show. The topic came up of his year in New England as an offensive assistant and he was asked if he ever saw anything shady going on.I did worry me....hopefully Chris Simms is stoned again and these weren't his real thoughts
I'm sure that they have. I am sure that Boston has, also. You need more than a few days to handle the logistics for that.I wonder if LA has already planned their victory parade and the parade route. If so bill should let the players know.
Lombardi also said the Pats suck and wouldn't make it past the first round lmaoLombardi likes the Pats 28-24. That’s a big difference from last year where he said he is picking the Eagles “come hell or high water”. Lol
I read an article that not only was there a record amount of $ bet on NFL games this year but Vegas (expectedly) made a record profit on these bets.A guest odds maker on Zo and Bertrand yesterday said that the vast majority of Sharp bets were going for the Pats.
Just listened ESPN's Doug Kezirian podcast. He interviewed an oddsmaker who said that Vegas has accumulated a lot of cushion from previous future bets, they actually would win on Pats.I read an article that not only was there a record amount of $ bet on NFL games this year but Vegas (expectedly) made a record profit on these bets.
Looking like Vegas could either extend those record profits astronomically or they could take a MASSIVE hit. I'm really surprised they haven't moved the lines more to entice bettors to pick the Rams.
Just listened ESPN's Doug Kezirian podcast. He interviewed an oddsmaker who said that Vegas has accumulated a lot of cushion from previous future bets, they actually would win on Pats.
The PFF Super Bowl Preview touched on this a little. Essentially they said that Vegas kind of put themselves in a pickle by offering NFC -2 before the CG's. They were expecting the Saints. They still have to cover those bets so if the Pats line moved to -3 or beyond it would allow the sharps to buy both sides. I didn't get the mechanics of that but it sounds sort of related to what you are describing.
PFT’s Super Bowl picks
I don’t understand how MDS says the Rams roster is better top-to-bottom than ours.
Lombardi likes the Pats 28-24. That’s a big difference from last year where he said he is picking the Eagles “come hell or high water”. Lol
MDS is a goofPFT’s Super Bowl picks
I don’t understand how MDS says the Rams roster is better top-to-bottom than ours.
I remember him giving his reasoning for Philly winning. He didn't trust the Pats defense against that particular offense. Boy was he right lol.
Probably had something to do with benching their 2016 NFL Pro Bowl cornerback Butler 10 minutes before the game and having 3 DB teammates all play out of position.
.
Listening to him on XM he sounds extremely confident about how we match up.Oh I agree that played a factor too. I think it's a good sign Lombardi is picking the Patriots. He really knows his stuff.
MDS is a goof
Florio going with the Giants / Broncos score for SB 21.
Im growing with more confidence by the hour
PFT’s Super Bowl picks
I don’t understand how MDS says the Rams roster is better top-to-bottom than ours.
Outside of Tom Brady...the Rams absolutely have a better roster