- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 28,220
- Reaction score
- 30,864
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.ya fatmasse, reported every move on the walsh talks with the nfl, where is he now?? sitting at dunkin donuts nervously eating a dozen bavarion cremesInteresting. All the media outlets reporting the submission of the Walsh tapes with no Super Bowl walk through.
Yet nothing from the Herald. Perhaps they've gone into hiding and are waiting for the hammer to drop any day now.
:bricks:
Tomass posted something 2 minutes ago
You gotta forgive Tomase. He is a little busy updating his resume to post it on his blog.
Poor Tomase he doesn't get his respect as a journalist.
Mike and Mike had to keep looking at his name to remember it and couldn't ever pronounce it.
I'd love to read some of those 41+ comments to Tomase on his blog, but I REFUSE to relent on the Herald/Tomase ban. That Fat A S S and the worthless rag he works for will get not hits from me. I hope Kraft sues them for whatever their declining readership brings in.
Walsh’s attorney, Michael Levy, later confirmed the story’s accuracy in an e-mail to the Herald.
Walsh did not turn over a tape of the Rams’ final walkthrough before Super Bowl XXXVI. Addressing media speculation about such a tape, as well as the Herald’s Feb. 2 story about the walkthrough, Levy told the Times, “Mr. Walsh has never claimed to have a tape of the walkthrough.
“Mr. Walsh has never been the source of any of the media speculation about such a tape,” Levy added. “Mr. Walsh was not the source for the Feb. 2 Boston Herald article.”
I was hoping to wallow in some good old-fashioned Schadenfreude, but, not surprisingly, they've turned the comments forms off, but only on Tomase's blog. I wonder why. . . .
| 43 | 3K |
| 210 | 9K |
| 57 | 9K |
| 78 | 7K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 2 - June 17 (Through 26yrs)











