SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Is that right? How did that come out? Did Goodell say it?All the tapes were 2006 and 2007... so much for those tainted super bowls.
Is that right? How did that come out? Did Goodell say it?
If everything posted here is true (thanks cincipatsfan, btw) then Goodall should have looked at the tapes, taken away a #3 or #4 pick for being bad boys for disobeying him and moved along. Again, assuming he's telling the truth the #1 pick seems more unfair than ever.This entire thing is avoided if he had just said this back in September, the ENTIRE THING. The fact that he let the Patriots name get dragged through the mud all season is a joke and we should be compensated for defamation of character. A first round pick will do.
I was surprised at how direct some of his answers were.
"every team knows its signals are being stolen by other teams"
"every team takes measures during a game knowing their signals are being stolen"
"on one tape, an opposing coach is seen waving at the camera"
"the Patriots gained no competitive advantage from those tapes"
He said the above statement at least 3 times.
It seems some are disappointed by his answers and keep asking the same stupid thing over and over.
I wish he had been this direct over the impact, or lack thereof, of these tapes back in Sept.
This entire thing is avoided if he had just said this back in September, the ENTIRE THING. The fact that he let the Patriots name get dragged through the mud all season is a joke and we should be compensated for defamation of character. A first round pick will do.
Ties to the league? Like, he owns a team?? Oh my god, there must be a conspiracy! No other owner has ties to the league!if he doesn't even know the pats played the eagles in the 03-04 regular season, how can anyone trust he's hiding more than he lets on? this all smells very fishy, especially with robby kraft's ties to the league.
Because they were specifically told not to do it, and did it anyway.so then why take away a 1rd draft pick? i agree with him, the pats didnt gain any competetive advantage, however, why were they punished so harshly then? just b/c they were on the wrong spot on the field?
im asking cuz thats the excuse all the haters are using now, u say the pats didnt cheat, they ask why were they dogged a first round pick?
myself it should have been a 3rd pick, just for going against it, but it was pathetic how goodell tried to shut everyone up by taking away a 1st round pick, when in fact the opposite happened
I hope the media/public revisit their perceptions after this press conference. There's a lot of retractions that need to be made.
if he doesn't even know the pats played the eagles in the 03-04 regular season, how can anyone trust he's hiding more than he lets on? this all smells very fishy, especially with robby kraft's ties to the league.
I heard the press con. and thought the same thing. He vindicated the Pats(said they gained nothing and the other teams knew they were being taped) But said the punishment was fair.If everything posted here is true (thanks cincipatsfan, btw) then Goodall should have looked at the tapes, taken away a #3 or #4 pick for being bad boys for disobeying him and moved along. Again, assuming he's telling the truth the #1 pick seems more unfair than ever.
if he doesn't even know the pats played the eagles in the 03-04 regular season, how can anyone trust he's hiding more than he lets on? this all smells very fishy, especially with robby kraft's ties to the league.