Wozzy
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2018
- Messages
- 15,636
- Reaction score
- 21,882
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.That's not how it works. He's on the PUP list. If they cut him, they save a whole whopping 1.35M this year. They're not going to get Landry to take an Injury Settlement. Plus 11M of his salary is guaranteed.Not surprised just IR him already or a injury settlement.
Yes there is.There is clearly a reason that Vrabel didn't sign Clowney dating back to last year when Clowney was a free agent.
We will see after cuts come - there could be some veterans let go by teams with depth.Any decent vets out there worth signing?
No one's going to give the Giants what they're asking for, even though I think he's probably worth what they're asking for. For the exact reason you specified.We will see after cuts come - there could be some veterans let go by teams with depth.
Thibedeaux could be had via trade but he's on the expensive side with his 5th year guranteed
$15 million is a lot to pay him to sit on their bench as he's effectively 3rd on the depth chart there, but I'm sure they will cycle him in.No one's going to give the Giants what they're asking for, even though I think he's probably worth what they're asking for. For the exact reason you specified.
We'll have lots of blitzing; our secondary will be up to the task.Might be a long season of watching mediocre QBs getting too much time and finding the open guys time after time.. ugh
Maybe Clowney didn't want to come here.Clowney should’ve been the guy damnit!
Very good run defender.
8.5 sacks in 14 games last year playing about 45% of the snaps.
$5.5M is what he signed for.
This is a miss on our part imo.
Clowney has been a mercenary since he first left the Texans.Maybe Clowney didn't want to come here.
I think this is the strat. Which is why adding depth in the secondary was so important this offseason.We'll have lots of blitzing; our secondary will be up to the task.
Indeed. Maybe he wanted to go back home. Play in a dome 10 times. Maybe that was worth a couple bucks? A team where he can play 15 snaps a game.Clowney has been a mercenary since he first left the Texans.
Maybe not.Maybe Clowney didn't want to come here.
Blitzing is great, and we did it a **** ton in the playoffs. But it’s not sustainable over a full season. Teams with decent QBs and OCs will eat that **** alive.I think this is the strat. Which is why adding depth in the secondary was so important this offseason.
Yes, it would be even more effective with better overall front 6 players, but this is how you cover up a below-average Edge and LB corps.
Sure. That's the risk you take.Blitzing is great, and we did it a **** ton in the playoffs. But it’s not sustainable over a full season. Teams with decent QBs and OCs will eat that **** alive.
Good points.Sure. That's the risk you take.
It can work if you have the secondary to back it up. I think they might have the secondary to back it up. If they don't, they'll get croaked, and you have to rely on your high-powered offense to win shootouts.
Honestly, it's not the most well-balanced way to build a team, but Vrabel/Cowden/Highsmith weren't dealing with 50 all-pros on the team when they got here. It's a refreshing approach based in reality. This would also explain their emphasis on turnovers this offseason - an uptick in that particular variance could push one or two games a different way - and a turnover gets that stuff off the field.
We learned (at least I hope we did), an important lesson last year, one that many of us knew already. You can't rebuild a talent-depleted roster in a year, or two years. You *can* win a lot of games in the time it takes to fill the gaps, though.
| 19 | 263 |
| 27 | 2K |
| 16 | 311 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
August 11 - August 26 (Through 26yrs)










