This is as good a clip on what it takes to be a good QB as I've heard. It's also a great explanation of the differences in QB development that young QB's get.
Tom Brady did NOT come to the Pats even close to fully developed or a star. Remember he sat his entire first year except for a few plays. He threw IIRC about 167 yds in that Rams superbowl and about 50 of them came in the last drive. We used to laugh at Peyton for performances like that when they won the superbowl. My biggest memory of his 3rd year was that he dedicated his off season that 9-7 year to NOT fumbling as much as he did in 02. I remember that it wasn't until over 10 years in that gave us "I know all the answers to the test" comment.
There is so much more than physical ability that makes up what makes up a good QB as Brady pointed out and just how LUCKY he was to come to a team that actually developed him. Few people remember that was Tom's QB coach his 2nd and 3rd years was Bill like he pointed out.
I hate it that too many fans want to give Tom the sole reason for the Pats success while he was here. Thank God Tom ISN'T one of them. He understands how football works.
Absolutely. What we love to do is argue -- take a side, dig in, and see how much we can deride the opponent. Brady is clear-eyed (as are many fans, but you don't notice 100% of the arguments that don't happen).
Now, to throw in some gasoline for the fire, you
can say that although the Pats organization under Belichick did an absolutely amazing job developing Brady, they were one of several organizations that might have that success. He would have thrived in all but the terrible few that simply break quarterbacks habitually.
Brady, on the other hand, is
super rare as a talent/personality... and it combined with a dynasty-founding narrative that reeked of manifest destiny. It was four years before he lost in the post-season, and he had 3 rings under his belt when it happened. Then he always grew as an individual player, even when that invincibility bubble burst.
I think the 6 rings comes from a perfect storm resulting in the perception, for Brady, for the team, for all of us, that winning it all was always in their own hands. It was there for the taking, year after year, and he refused to look at the game any other way. Give him another narrative and he'd probably be Drew Brees or Peyton Manning. Not a bad thing to be, mind you, but not Tom Brady.
It all had to come together
as it did for Brady to be Brady and for New England to be New England in the 2000s and the 2010s, as we knew them.