- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Messages
- 16,349
- Reaction score
- 30,108
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He'd be devastating as a fullbackI drafted Lampkin in like 90% of my mocks as backup C and vicious fullback option. I’d be all for them claiming him. Has to be better than Caedan Wallace.
Bourne is extremely well regarded by the players and coaching staff as a veteran in that room. If he's on the field in five wide sets, he can be a threat. Last season he was the #1 wideout and couldn't separate. If Diggs draws the top DB, Bourne can be productive.This makes Bourne not being IR-DTR an even bigger head scratcher.
Duh, ************There is no way, the Patriots have 8 WRs week 1.
There are still trades to be made. Sometimes, you have to keep someone on the 53 to make an interested team know that they are not getting that player aside for trading for him. Not that they will get much more than a third day pick for any of them, but I would not be surprised in the least if one of Bourne, Jennings and Dugger or more is traded in the next few days. If not, the spot on the 53 is being held by a legit NFL caliber player who might be useful for depth or be available to trade in season.Unless he’s actually not hurt anymore, which may be possible. He would have rightly been upset if placed on IR while healthy enough to play now. Who knows at this point?
He isn’t even the fifth WR.Bourne is extremely well regarded by the players and coaching staff as a veteran in that room. If he's on the field in five wide sets, he can be a threat. Last season he was the #1 wideout and couldn't separate. If Diggs draws the top DB, Bourne can be productive.
Mapu has been the only guy that shown any real ability to cover Tight Ends. That being real sore spot on this defense made Mapu a likely keep just for that skill alone.When I first looked at the updated roster, I missed F-ton on the list and was ready to loose my ****.
Surprised Mapu isn't a cut. I assume he's a heavy special teamer.
There is no way we have 8 WR’s after waiver claims tomorrowThere is no way, the Patriots have 8 WRs week 1.
The OL is an interesting situation this year. The reports out of camp by Moses and others were that this was the best OL coaching staff they'd ever worked with. (Dante was the very best ever in my estimation.) That said, they must have talked long and hard about who to keep and who to let go. I'm very interested to see who they sign off the waiver wire and if Cole Strange comes back if he clears waivers. There will probably be three practice squad offensive linemen. On defense, this team is much faster and smaller than the Belichick teams. I'm glad they kept Dugger - he worked his ass off in camp to make this team.They kept 6 DL.
They kept 5 CB and 6 safeties if you count Schooler. 7 safeties if you count Mapu.
Why would you keep extra OL if they aren't as good as the WR you have? Help me comprehend that train of thought.
You know who else just got cut and has familiarity with Drake?
Bryson Nesbit TE
He's not a blocking TE but definitely worth a look.
Just looking for attention.Are people that keep repeating how dumbfounded they are over the 8 receivers being intentionally dense about the situation?
It takes little brain power to read between the lines here.
The OL is an interesting situation this year. The reports out of camp by Moses and others were that this was the best OL coaching staff they'd ever worked with. (Dante was the very best ever in my estimation.) That said, they must have talked long and hard about who to keep and who to let go. I'm very interested to see who they sign off the waiver wire and if Cole Strange comes back if he clears waivers. There will probably be three practice squad offensive linemen. On defense, this team is much faster and smaller than the Belichick teams. I'm glad they kept Dugger - he worked his ass off in camp to make this team.
What lines?Are people that keep repeating how dumbfounded they are over the 8 receivers being intentionally dense about the situation?
It takes little brain power to read between the lines here.
Unless of course Patten comes back to life. No way I'd cut that guy.There is no way, the Patriots have 8 WRs week 1.
| 128 | 6K |
| 103 | 4K |
| 93 | 3K |
| 97 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











