- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 12,275
- Reaction score
- 21,631
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Boston.com | Posted: 04/17 New! |
| Ian Rapoport: Patriots trading for A.J. Brown ‘most likely scenario’ this offseason |
The Athletic | Posted: 04/17 New! |
| What I'd do if I were in charge of the Patriots for the 2026 NFL Draft |
NBC Sports Boston | Posted: 04/16 New! |
| Prioritizing power? Best offensive guard fits for Patriots in NFL Draft |
98.5 The Sports Hub | Posted: 04/16 New! |
| Barth’s 2026 Felger & Mazz Big Board reactions: Defensive backs |
Patriots.com | Posted: 04/16 New! |
| Deuce's 2026 Patriots Mock Draft 2.0 |
| 2026 Pre-Draft Meetings 4 Reactions | 04/17 at 4:56 am |
| 2026 Draft: WR 4 Reactions | 04/16 at 8:22 pm |
| TODAY'S TOP POSTERS: | # | |
| manxman2601 | 27 posts | |
| DaBruinz | 17 posts | |
| DoubleDeluxe | 14 posts | |
| mayoclinic | 12 posts | |
| Clonamery | 12 posts |
Looking like a trade/cut candidate. Some of those deals handed out last year are regrettable. On the flip side it seems to mean good things for Woodson.
Schooler?Who backs up Peppers if we get rid of Dug’s? Not may lb/safety hybrid types on the team. Can Woodson hold up in the box? I’m assuming Mapu is a goner.
Looking like a trade/cut candidate. Some of those deals handed out last year are regrettable. On the flip side it seems to mean good things for Woodson.
That was an awful contract.He's just not a traditional S and Vrabel is phasing out the "hybrids". The guy was getting spun in circles when his snap count went up and had to play deep. Bill absolutely wouldn't have paid Dugger what they did in 2024. One of the most idiotic contracts the Pats have handed out.
If they can't find a trade partner, this will be his last season as his dead cap is $14M and cap savings of $1M in 2025 to a dead cap of $4.5M and $12.5M in cap savings in 2026.
One of several.That was an awful contract.
Almost like BB wanted to sabotage the franchise.One of several.
Unless the joke went directly over my head, I think it was Wolf who gave out the contract to Dugger.Almost like BB wanted to sabotage the franchise.
It went completely over your head.Unless the joke went directly over my head, I think it was Wolf who gave out the contract to Dugger.
Vrabel has Mapu playing LB, not safety. Mapu is unrelated.Who backs up Peppers if we get rid of Dug’s? Not may lb/safety hybrid types on the team. Can Woodson hold up in the box? I’m assuming Mapu is a goner.
Speculation: One thing Vrabel made clear Day 1 was removing entitlement from the building.Still a few weeks until the season begins maybe he just trying the rookie out in his position to see how he does. Time will tell.
That’s a possibility, I never heard that about Dugger previously but who knows.Speculation: One thing Vrabel made clear Day 1 was removing entitlement from the building.
I have no idea if Dugger is "entitled" but if Vrabel thinks he is, this would be the way to remove it.
There’s definitely a game plan specific place for him on this team. Going up against the Derrick Henry’s and Kyren Williams of this league will be a couple of them. Especially on obvious running downs. The contract is what it is. They signed him based on the personal they had, not on who we drafted. Sometimes it’s just blind luck you you land a safety in the 4th round. If they didn’t sign Dugger, he walked and Woodson ending up being a confused rookie where would this team be at? Hawkins has had a promising offseason and camp and played ok last season, but would everyone of felt ok with Hawkins being the starting safety opposite Peppers? Plenty of teams have made the same of overpaying after the fact. It’s not the end of the world.The same ****ing people who would have called Kraft cheap if they HADN'T signed him are the same ones who are complaining they paid too much for him now. You know the guy with 20-20 hindsight.
First of all, this is a freakin' walk through and the media wants to make a big deal about who gets to stand around with whom on the practice field. I don't blame them because they have to write SOMETHING about a nothing practice, but WE are supposed to be intelligent consumers of the product, and we are taking it all so seriously
But let's take the worst-case scenario we all seem to like so very much. In our system it looks like we will be playing 3 safeties a lot in passing situation and as of this moment about halfway through camp those three guys are going to be Hawkins, Peppers, and Woodson. Those are the 3 guys who are playing the best at THIS point and time, and Duggar is the 4th What's wrong with that.
Duggar has proven in his first 3 years he can be an impactful S. what were those stats I saw? He averaged 100 tackles and 3 picks per season and was a force rushing the passer. Even at less than 100% of what he was those first 3 years, he is more than just quality depth at the position. Sure, if that's all he ends up being, he's over paid quality depth, but STILL a guy who you are going to need and makes you a better deeper defense.
This is nothing more than an interesting camp story. It's not a crisis or someone's blunder. Most would have agreed Duggar deserved a raise and got a market deal. It's just that the market was high and the guy got hurt.
Just another case of the 2nd guessers enjoying hearing themselves talke.
I feel like every year a certain subset of fans get obsessed with ****canning this or that player.There's little saved by cutting him, and no developmental player as a replacement.
If they can't get something in a trade, why not keep him unless he's a problem.
| 178 | 13K |
| 34 | 8K |
| 199 | 20K |
| 10 | 911 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











