Bourne is being paid 7.7M dollars this year. That is enough to have the 30th highest cap hit among all WRs this year... and he will get a slight bump next year. Let me say that again. BOURNE IS GETTING PAID LIKE A #1 WR!!! (His cap hit is in the top 32, in a real sense mathematically this is accurate). And here we all talking about carrying him as our 4th or 5th guy? Why would we ever pay that kind of money to a guy who won't even see the field that much? Cause he's a good teammate? No way. We have other WRs who are good teammates and do it for cheaper.
Boutte is literally pennies on the dollar. And i would suggest to you him for about 1M can do just about anything Bourne does for 7.7M. Are we just going to pretend the cap doesn't matter? I mean, look at our defense! We were able to go from a pretty crap D to arguable a top 5 unit on paper due to our cap space. Spillane, Milton, Davis, ect... these guys are here because we had the cash to pay more than other teams were willing to. Period. I know Vrabel and others factored in... but the cash was the main thing.
If we want to continue this rebuild into next year... we need to get bad contracts off our books. Bourne is a bad contract. Let me ask if you... if Bourne went down today (I don't wish him to... just an an exercise) would you really feel all that different about the WR room? I wouldn't. Bourne hasn't produced much in years. The hopes he can rekindle his career year now that McDaniels is back highly unlikely. And he would need to be AT LEAST that good to earn his contract.
Right now Boutte is cheap. Chism is cheap. We are stuck paying Polk anyway pretty much. Whoever we pick will be on the bench or a healthy scratch as much as not. Do we want those guys to be cheap young players who still have upside? Or 30 year old overprice Bourne who brings nothing of need to this team. At least Hollins brings size. Bourne is a guy who hasn't broken 450 yards in 3 straight years. Make all the excuses for it you want. That's a fact.
I say cut him and go with the young upside guys who are either cheap or already pretty much fully paid for.
My six are: Diggs, Williams, Douglas, Hollins (vet leadership, size STs), Chism (pure upside and love his skill set) and then Polk vs Boutte. If Polk shows he is turning things around he can keep his spot... otherwise cut bait. Boutte is cheap this and next year and showed some promise.
As an aside i think the Chism vs Douglas dynamic is interesting.... both play a very similar style... both are super young and cheap. It could be like when they had Edelman and Amendola and you were curious how they would use both... they found a way. So it isn't like it isn't possible. I don't subscribe to the idea you can't have multiple guys on the field with similar skill sets. If used well and you have other guys to give them space, you can get a player who has no business covering a guy like that to cover one of them, cause most teams don't have 2 guys with the skill set to cover slot guys. It really can work, so i am not afraid of doing it.