- Joined
- Oct 17, 2007
- Messages
- 2,566
- Reaction score
- 5,823
I think this is not the consensus. Jeanty is comparable as prospect or Jonathan Taylor and Bijan Robinson. Todd Gurley is another similar prospect.Scenario for you - and I'll start this by saying I don't want a RB at 4 overall.
Let's say we draft Campbell, and he becomes a guard because his arms are in fact too small... highly possible right? In fact historically probable.
And - let's also say Jeanty becomes an all-pro back, also highly possible, widely projected even.
In that scenario, a year from now - would we not regret passing on a blue chip offensive player for an average guard? Especially when this is how both players were projected by most?
Campbell is expected to be a perennial pro bowl guard with all pro upside, he's not projected as an average guard.
Add to that the hit rate on linemen is much higher than running backs.
Your saying all-pro running back vs average guard, well yeah of course go RB. 100% of people say yes to that but that's not the debate on Campbell vs Jeanty,
The consensus is PRO BOWL GUARD vs PRO BOWL RB with a 31.5% chance the guard ends up succeeding more than the RB.
I think based on the Jeanty comps he's going to be at least good, but a Todd Gurley career is just as likely as anything, RB's take a lot of pounding, Would you want 15 years of Joe Thuney or 5-6 years of Jeanty?
It's not a clear-cut answer but with a very deep RB class and RB not a major weakness it seems RB in first round is not the best use of capital.
I'm even leaving out the possibility Campbell plays LT at a very high level.












