- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 3,020
- Reaction score
- 4,477
We have 2 inhouse candidates in Sow and Robinson, both of whom have flashed talent and could be coached up.If C isn’t a need then LG is.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.We have 2 inhouse candidates in Sow and Robinson, both of whom have flashed talent and could be coached up.If C isn’t a need then LG is.
We were supposed to be in on Will Fries and the rumour coming out of the combine was that they were looking for a mid-level centre. So let's just wait and see.We don't know what Marrone thinks of Onwenu, Sow, Robinson, Strange, D Andrews, and J Andrews. The cupboard isn't bare at the IOL positions, and the lack of action yesterday on G's and C's suggests he might be OK with what we have. He may think Robinson can be the starting LG and Strange the starting Center.
Same goes for Wallace at T, I'm very curious what Marrone thinks of him.
'flashed talent' and 'could be coached' doesn't suggest confidence in their abilities to be starters.We have 2 inhouse candidates in Sow and Robinson, both of whom have flashed talent and could be coached up.
Respectfully disagree that either has flashed anything other than abject assness.We have 2 inhouse candidates in Sow and Robinson, both of whom have flashed talent and could be coached up.
Ouch… the Anthony Richardson era is already over in Indy, talk about flushing a 4th overall pick down the toilet.
Too funny
Too funny
2 x 0 is still 0.Year 2 Jumps.
That is fair. It also depends on the Pats' assessment of Robinson, Sow, J Andrews, and possibly Wallace if the Pats draft a RT like Trapillo. At least we have possibilities at LG, even if unproven.If C isn’t a need then LG is.
You win todays initial prize for not understanding how things work AND not looking it up before posting. I'm starting to think it's America's greatest export.Funny you say that. In California, a man won a 2 Billion Dollar Lottery Prize, After taxes, the lump sum payout was LESS that a half billion. Most of the 1 and a half billion dollars in taxes were California State Taxes. The IRS actually took a small percentage by comparison. If I'd won that same prize here in Wisconsin, I would have taken home over 1 and a half billion after taxes.
Fair to say Indi fans are not really on board with this.That calls for a banner.
The boundless optimism of some fans never ceases to amaze me.We have 2 inhouse candidates in Sow and Robinson, both of whom have flashed talent and could be coached up.
Funny you say that. In California, a man won a 2 Billion Dollar Lottery Prize, After taxes, the lump sum payout was LESS that a half billion. Most of the 1 and a half billion dollars in taxes were California State Taxes. The IRS actually took a small percentage by comparison. If I'd won that same prize here in Wisconsin, I would have taken home over 1 and a half billion after taxes.
Just food for thought haha
Last year Lowe ranked 102/141 for overall OT grade on PFF. It was a more respectable 62/141 as a pass blocker and dreadful 132/141 as a run blocker.
They also absolute bottom of the barrel players at LG (Jordan/Robinson), Center (Ben Brown) and RT (Jacobs) alongside him. That made it really hard to help Lowe at LT and he was probably their best pass blocker so he's not the first guy to get help anyway. They're reportedly active in the Guard market so LG could be improved soon. Strange at Center should be better than Ben Brown. They added Moses who's an improvement at RT.
The question they have to ask themselves is that if you brought the rest of the line to respectability, how much does that elevate Lowe? It seems like a lost cause as a run blocker, but he could be a decent enough pass blocker maybe that he doesn't get Maye killed. I don't think it's absurd that he could be ok as a stop gap if they can't address it in the draft.
The LT prospects are what they are. They don't get better or worse based on who we do or don't sign. The only option at LT this year who really makes it no longer a need was Alaric Jackson. Stanley is old and injury prone. Cam Robinson is a stop gap. Dan Moore is a "meh" starter. Jaylon Moore was a gamble. Everyone else is a dart throw. If they think there's a long term starting LT on the board that probably should be the pick no matter what. The only exception would be if you think there's an absolute MONSTER on the board at another spot.If we're going into the draft with Lowe as our LT, there is no way they don't address it in the draft, probably with pick 4.
If we're going into the draft with Lowe as our LT, there is no way they don't address it in the draft, probably with pick 4.
Hunter won’t be there unless we trade up to 2 with Cleveland.If Hunter is available no way they draft a LT over him unless they get a haul for trading back to 6 or 7 that includes couple of 2nd rounders.
| 23 | 775 |
| 1 | 295 |
| 13 | 615 |
| 11 | 437 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











