- Joined
- Jul 3, 2010
- Messages
- 13,449
- Reaction score
- 20,330
1 or 2 now, 4 years later if he is consistent.He's young we can lock him up for Four Years: he can already play Guard.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.1 or 2 now, 4 years later if he is consistent.He's young we can lock him up for Four Years: he can already play Guard.
This is a sensible idea.I think it's worth a shot. And Onwenu's deal is set up to cut him next year too so if he fails as a LT again you can move him back to RG.
MIN has Darrisaw coming back and won't be interested. JAX just traded him because they have a younger player so even if they're still living there that's not where he's ending up most likely. Pretty sure his family is moving regardless if it's here or elsewhere.My guess is he's trying to talk his family into taking the fatter offer from the Pats and making them move... again.
Agreed. But if Hunter is available in R1, are there any starting LTs in R2 of the 2025 draft?
Yeah you ain't the only one concerned.My one criticism of what we've done so far is not addressing the O Line too much yet. The Bears made it a priority to give Caleb Williams protection and set their stall out to do so; and did it well. For all the talk of the trenches, we haven't done the same. It's early so this is a temporary complaint hopefully, but is just something that is gnawing at me. Hopefully by the end of the day it will be less of an issue.
There should be. There are about 6 OTs that I'd say could start.Agreed. But if Hunter is available in R1, are there any starting LTs in R2 of the 2025 draft?
While I agree with your sentiment, Vrabel and Co. clearly have a vision of the type of player they want and the assets they are willing (or not willing) to part with. I am proceeding cautiously. Rome wasn't built in a day. I think Plan A was Stanley, but he never made it to FA. They are on to plan B. Like I said in another post, if they are going to get a LT in FA, then they are paying a heavy market tax for the position.My one criticism of what we've done so far is not addressing the O Line too much yet. The Bears made it a priority to give Caleb Williams protection and set their stall out to do so; and did it well. For all the talk of the trenches, we haven't done the same. It's early so this is a temporary complaint hopefully, but is just something that is gnawing at me. Hopefully by the end of the day it will be less of an issue.
I think Matthew Golden is a very risky with all this First Round talk Teta Mac is better.It would require a trade up to be safe. Connerly will likely be gone at 38 and ersery is rising fast , too risky to stay put. Hopefully we are planning to be more aggressive than last year either way. If hunter is not there and we go tackle first , id still want the trade up for golden or egbuka.
My next question was going to be, other than Cam Robinson, do we have any coaching links to the remaining OL?While I agree with your sentiment, Vrabel and Co. clearly have a vision of the type of player they want and the assets they are willing (or not willing) to part with. I am proceeding cautiously. Rome wasn't built in a day. I think Plan A was Stanley, but he never made it to FA. They are on to plan B. Like I said in another post, if they are going to get a LT in FA, then they are paying a heavy market tax for the position.
Jedrick WillsMy next question was going to be, other than Cam Robinson, do we have any coaching links to the remaining OL?
I have not looked that deeply into it.My next question was going to be, other than Cam Robinson, do we have any coaching links to the remaining OL?
Thanks. I forgot that one.Jedrick Wills
Vrabel and Jedrick Wills last year.My next question was going to be, other than Cam Robinson, do we have any coaching links to the remaining OL?
I think Matthew Golden is a very risky with all this First Round talk Teta Mac is better.
I won't cry if it's Wills. You're going to get the usual sky am falling 'he sucks' comments, but again, he's better than Verdarian Lowe and Chuks, and Michael Jordan, and whatever fat tubs of suck they rolled out there last year.Thanks. I forgot that one.
If the Patriots want McMillan, he will definitely be there at 4.Ive played out probably 94 scenarios in my head involving pick 4 , 38, and trades up and down involving both and McMillan is in a couple of them for sure
Preaching to the choir.I won't cry if it's Wills. You're going to get the usual sky am falling 'he sucks' comments, but again, he's better than Verdarian Lowe and Chuks, and Michael Jordan, and whatever fat tubs of suck they rolled out there last year.
| 23 | 950 |
| 1 | 298 |
| 13 | 699 |
| 11 | 493 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 16 - May 1 (Through 26yrs)











