Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,598
- Reaction score
- 22,428
Yesterday you told me they would even resemble functional until mid seasonPerhaps if the OL was set early in camp, and looked good in the pre-season, THEN Maye might have started Game 1.
I certainly saw it as POSSIBLE that Okorafor would look good at LT and either Wallace at RT, Wallace at swing, or Onwenu at rt and RObinson starting. As some have been saying for months, the OL MAY be a player away from competency with four starters in place: Sow, Andrews, Onwenu and either Robinson or Wallace.
The key was and is Okorafor. If he is a semi-competent LT, then he or Lowe can start and backup, and that line can start all year.
So your argument now if that the QBs really were competing for a job, but it was actually the OL competing to determine the QB?
Look, this team is going to blow this year. That for was catches they chose not to try to be competitive and save money instead.
So these decisions won’t have a visible impact this year, except people who weren’t aware this team would blow.
But what I find important isn’t the decisions but the methodology. Decisions I see as bad made in the framework of good methodology are just the consequence of it being impossible to always get it right in a competitive sport.
But if the methodology is bad, there will be a lot more bad decisions than good ones.
Whatever methodology led to drafting a QB with the 3rd pick, then being scared to play him because you can’t protect him (if in fact that there story) while leaving 50,000,000 on the table is terrible methodology. And that points to long range failure.
Last edited:












