PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Which fanbase was more delusional this offseason?

Next Opp: TBD
THE HUB FOR PATRIOTS FANS SINCE 2000

CURRENT POPULAR DISCUSSIONS:
2026 Pats schedule leaks
Posted By: sb1
May 15, 2026 at 2:48 am
Total Replies: 190

# Of Users:51
IanDarrylSSean Pa Patriot40yrpatsfanbresnatuckeverlastingTriumphTunescribeJoeSixPatctpatsfan77DaBruinz
What is our plan for ILB?
Posted By: JayNM
May 15, 2026 at 2:21 am
Total Replies: 235

# Of Users:42
Ianmgteichcaptain stoneGumbyWater BoystinkypeteZumaStateDaBruinzp8rytsRxJock1120
TODAY'S MOST REACTED POSTS:
raduray2026 Pats schedule leaks
2 Reactions
05/14 at 11:49 pm

By: raduray

rkarp1What is our plan for ILB?
1 Reactions
05/14 at 12:52 pm

By: rkarp1

TODAY'S TOP POSTERS:#
WhatJustHappened4 posts
tuckeverlasting1 posts
n1997y1 posts
ctpatsfan771 posts
Joey0071 posts
 

Which team's fans were more delusional this offseason?


  • Total voters
    14
Status
Not open for further replies.

ctpatsfan77

PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
33,551
Reaction score
19,360
Now that we have the benefit of a little bit of hindsight . . . which fan base do you think was more delusional this offseason?

The Bears, for thinking that Justin Fields was somehow the solution to the Patriots' QB woes? To the point that some of them felt that he was worth trading down from #3 to #9 for, and a few truly delusional fans thought he was worth the #3 overall?

Or the Vikings, for thinking the Pats would let the Vikings have Drake Maye and willingly go into the QB wilderness for less than a "historic return"?
 
At the time I could understand the logic of the hypothetical Vikings trade, based on the reality of the Patriots having so many holes to fill.

The concept of Fields garnering a #3 overall pick never made any sense, on multiple levels.

There were a few here on this site that were every bit as delusional as the Bears fans (and some in the media) were.

 
The bears for sure. Justin fields yielded essentially the same that mac jones did in a trade. Anyone trading #3 for fields and #9 would have been fired on the spot.

Three first rounders is tough to turn down.
 
Did any Bears fans actually expect Fields would return so much value?
 
With how everyone thinks the jete won the SB lotto ticket with AR and are going all the way this year…how did they not get a spot?!? But yea the dude with the pink wallet and nails’ team. DaBears…
 
Always and forever will be the Cowboys
 
Now that we have the benefit of a little bit of hindsight . . . which fan base do you think was more delusional this offseason?

The Bears, for thinking that Justin Fields was somehow the solution to the Patriots' QB woes? To the point that some of them felt that he was worth trading down from #3 to #9 for, and a few truly delusional fans thought he was worth the #3 overall?

Or the Vikings, for thinking the Pats would let the Vikings have Drake Maye and willingly go into the QB wilderness for less than a "historic return"?

I don't see why you'd call out those respective fan bases specifically. Speculative chatter about those moves was league wide, including Patriots fans, after Pats brass said they'd consider offers.
 
I don't see why you'd call out those respective fan bases specifically. Speculative chatter about those moves was league wide, including Patriots fans, after Pats brass said they'd consider offers.
This ^

We had some fans here telling us Fields was good and we should trade for him. Delusional is a good word for it…
 
This ^

We had some fans here telling us Fields was good and we should trade for him. Delusional is a good word for it…

I thought Fields would be worth trying out for a sixth- or a seventh-rounder, but certainly not trading out of No. 3 for. The Steelers deal for him might prove worthwhile.
 
I thought Fields would be worth trying out for a sixth- or a seventh-rounder, but certainly not trading out of No. 3 for. The Steelers deal for him might prove worthwhile.
We’d be trading for the Bear’s version of Mac Jones. The problem is both players only have a year left on their rookie deal, and nobody was picking up that 5th year option.

So you’d be taking a QB in the draft while also giving Fields or Mac a chance to redeem themselves for a year. You’d be taking away valuable time and reps from your rookie to fix a flawed player.

The best thing that could happen for both Fields and Mac is go sit on a bench for some time, preferably on a good team and learn how to play the QB position by watching a better vet.
 
We’d be trading for the Bear’s version of Mac Jones. The problem is both players only have a year left on their rookie deal, and nobody was picking up that 5th year option.

So you’d be taking a QB in the draft while also giving Fields or Mac a chance to redeem themselves for a year. You’d be taking away valuable time and reps from your rookie to fix a flawed player.

The best thing that could happen for both Fields and Mac is go sit on a bench for some time, preferably on a good team and learn how to play the QB position by watching a better vet.
Completely different QB's with different flaws in their game. The only thing they really had in common is they went through subpar coaching on their old teams....
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
2026 Patriots Schedule Sets Up Tough Start In Vrabel’s Second Season
MORSE: Patriots Rookie Mini Camp and Signings
Patriots News 05-10, Patriots Rookie Minicamp Starts
MORSE: Way Too Early 53-man Roster Projection
Several Remaining Patriots Free Agents Still Seeking Homes
ESPN Insider on Patriots A.J. Brown Trade: ‘I Think He Knows Where His Future is Headed’
Former Patriots Staffer Reveals Surprising Person Behind Two Key Player Cornerstone Additions in 2021
Patriots News 05-03, A.J. Brown Concerns, Vrabel’s Saga
MORSE: Clearing the Notebook from the Patriots Draft
What Does An Early Look At The Patriots’ 53-Man Roster Prediction Look Like?
Back
Top