- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 27,049
- Reaction score
- 21,972
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.That's what I said. What are this year's?Franchise, Transition and RFA Tenders | Over the Cap
Franchise, Transition and RFA Tenders | Over the Capoverthecap.com
You're using last year's numbers.
If there is one place they need to spend money on free agents, it's the offensive line. Whether they draft a QB high or bring in a veteran, that QB cannot be successful unless a veteran OL is in front of him giving him time.On one hand, I think they should bring him back because otherwise RT and LT are both vacant.
On the other hand, he'll be very expensive whether it's a re-sign or a franchise tag, and he's not an elite RT in the first place. The draft has a good crop of tackles. And maybe they think with a full offseason, one of Lowe or Wheatley can become the new RT.
After his exit presser, on the way out, Belichick was overheard saying he was not resigning Onwenu.
That's what I said. What are this year's?
How about - he has to want to stay here. Unless they're coming in with a huge 5/100 package with a bunch of guaranteed money, I don't see it, because some team is going to pay that guy a ton of money. I don't see Bob Kraft doing that.How about - Onwenu is one of the best players on this crappy team, so locking down some of the best players to start a new regime will be their priority.
And they might not have one when free agent decisions are made.That's what local media would do, but Fowler at ESPN has a better reputation that that. He got this from someone inside Foxboro now, but it's weird because they don't even have a GM yet.
Someone on this board has been asking the question for months.How about - Onwenu is one of the best players on this crappy team, so locking down some of the best players to start a new regime will be their priority.
They got him in the 6th Round. They can do it again (although maybe in an earlier Round). They shouldn't overpay for him. Just my humble opinion.On one hand, I think they should bring him back because otherwise RT and LT are both vacant.
On the other hand, he'll be very expensive whether it's a re-sign or a franchise tag, and he's not an elite RT in the first place. The draft has a good crop of tackles. And maybe they think with a full offseason, one of Lowe or Wheatley can become the new RT.
Generally they have done a good job finding OL talent on the whole the mid-to-late rounds, yeah.They got him in the 6th Round. They can do it again (although maybe in an earlier Round). They shouldn't overpay for him. Just my humble opinion.
Because a tag is 21.7 million dollars, and 2 first round picks is the compensation.Why not tag and trade him?
They don't have a choice if he wants to leave.
They just need to have a solid O-line Coach or Coach's to bring out their full potential.Generally they have done a good job finding OL talent on the whole the mid-to-late rounds, yeah.
Is he moving to left tackle?I'd start at 5/90... 18 a year aav, 25m signing bonus, 55m fully guaranteed...
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 20 - May 5 (Through 26yrs)











