- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 19,486
- Reaction score
- 21,586
Did PEDton Manning's victim sue Tennessee?The woman is suing the school.
Where the real money is.
Aren't the schools losing money now that students are keeping their student loan money?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Did PEDton Manning's victim sue Tennessee?The woman is suing the school.
Where the real money is.
Hell yeah she sued everyone…. Then when the Mannings violated the confidentiality terms of the settlement, she sued ‘em again.Did PEDton Manning's victim sue Tennessee?
No, because the schools are simply raising tuition as a response. The more money government gives to students, the more colleges raise their tuition, thereby making the problem worse.Aren't the schools losing money now that students are keeping their student loan money?
You don’t have to go to trial to be put in jail.
You know that, right?
You have to go to trial to be put in prison.
DA will often indict a criminal on a lesser charge while investigating a larger charge. Extremely common.
The Bills Mafia is defending this kid that I'd want cut instantly if he were a Patriot.That’s what i’ve been trying to explain to Upstater for two pages now.
No the schools already got the money from our government. They have to raise our taxes to get it back since they are letting the people who benefitted from it get off without paying.Did PEDton Manning's victim sue Tennessee?
Aren't the schools losing money now that students are keeping their student loan money?
"Cut instantly"...? Really...? You wouldn't want due process to play out?The Bills Mafia is defending this kid that I'd want cut instantly if he were a Patriot.
It varies from state to state. In the state of CA, there are 3 levels. Araiza fits in the middle:Can somebody update me on statutory rape? Is an 18 year old guy who has consensual sex with his 17 year old, long time girlfriend, guilty of the same charge as a 30 year old having "consensual" sex with a 16 year old? Is the law written so as to account for the variation in damage done, and imbalance of power relationship? And is it the same if the genders are reversed?
The Bills Mafia is defending this kid that I'd want cut instantly if he were a Patriot.
I've wanted people cut for a lot lesser than this (and thankfully they were cut)
It's astonishing you're defending this
Innocent until proven guilty > guilty until proven innocent. Absolutely nobody has defended the kid in this thread. The allegations sound horrible. The reality is that, unfortunately, too many women in too many high profile cases have cried wolf on something like this over the years. Women should not automatically be believed just because they say something happened.Sports is funny. People will defend rapists and sexual abusers like deshaun watson and this kid because they are good at a kids game...
Then we wonder why women don't come forward when they are sexually assaulted or raped.
Innocent until proven guilty > guilty until proven innocent. Absolutely nobody has defended the kid in this thread. The allegations sound horrible. The reality is that, unfortunately, too many women in too many high profile cases have cried wolf on something like this over the years. Women should not automatically be believed just because they say something happened.
The court of public opinion is a bunch of reactionary morons. That’s why they’re not taken seriously in an court of law. And yes, I agree that there’s smoke, but the process should play out before we all jump on a bandwagon. He’s still allowed to tell his side of the story. This isn’t the Soviet Union.That's only in the court of law..not the court of public opinion. Nothing says people can't have an opinion on what happened unless someone is charged criminally.
In that case bill Cosby and OJ Simpson are innocent because they are free men. When we all know they did what they did.
There is more smoke here and with deshan Watson that would say they are guilty than not whether they are charged...I mean both admitted to having sex with the women who charged them.
Now it's he said she said and it's telling that people are more apt to believe the millionaire athlete than the unnamed woman/women. Or will throw the "let's wait to see if they are found guilty!"
It’s also funny that you bring up OJ as an example. The glove fit, but the court of public opinion made so much noise that he walked.The court of public opinion is a bunch of reactionary morons. That’s why they’re not taken seriously in an court of law. And yes, I agree that there’s smoke, but the process should play out before we all jump on a bandwagon. He’s still allowed to tell his side of the story. This isn’t the Soviet Union.
I'll say it again since you're not getting it. I've wanted players cut for much, much less than what we already know about him. Before insulting people, think about 22 year olds admitting to sleeping with drunk 17 year olds and knowingly giving them STDs.In what way am I defending him?
I have said twice in this very thread that if the allegations are true that I want him cut from the team.
I hope you aren’t going senile in your older age
think about 22 year olds admitting to sleeping with drunk 17 year olds and knowingly giving them STDs.
Are you not following this case?He wasn’t 22 and we have no idea if he knew he had an STD when he had relations with her. He very well may have tested positive some time after that. We just don’t know yet.