We didn't get any rush on him. That's the whole point. A lot of teams are going with substandard CBs now and relying on pass rush.
When they take the rush off or stop blitzing, look what happens.
I'm talking about the Bills without Tre White or the Bengals. These teams thrived with pass rush but got burned otherwise.
Have a look at this play:
See how quickly Allen looks to run when there's even a whiff of pressure on him? Right here the edge guys blow by him which allows him to leak out, and that's when he's super dangerous. But if you can pressure him a little without allowing him to break, you've got him.
Believe it or not, some teams did exactly that against the Bills. It's why they lost 7 games.
The Patriots don't have the personnel to do it, as they need one more guy up front to join Barmore and Judon.
Getting pressure on Allen makes a HUGE difference. I tried to explain this to a supposed Pats fan on Twitter who claimed that it didn't. He made the asinine remark that in games where Allen was sacked at least once, his QBR was over 97. The problem is that if you look at the 11 games he took a sack, 6 of them were losses. 5 were wins. In the 6 games that Allen wasn't sacked, they WON every game..
The 6 losses: (264 passing attempts)
16 sacks, 44 hurries, 26 hits = 86 pressures (32.6%)
The 5 wins where he was sacked once: (153 Passing attempts)
10 sacks, 13 hurries., 15 hits = 38 pressures (24.8%)
The other 6 wins: (229 passing attempts)
0 sacks, 37 hurries, 24 hits = 61 pressures. (26.6%)
In 7 of Allen's 11 wins, he had a QBR of at least 100.4.
He had 1 LOSS where his QBR was over 100. (107.4 against TEN)