- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 9,018
- Reaction score
- 21,516
Tag and trades are very much looked down on; the CBA says the team has to make a good faith effort to sign the guy. Not that it doesn’t happen (Matt Cassel), but when it happens it’s with the player’s consent or well after the time the tag was placed. There’s a decent risk that Jackson would have filed a grievance if the Pats tagged him with the express purpose of trading him (and thus significantly hurting his market).That's why I don't understand why we didn't tag him. It would have been a steal considering what he got. It's probable considering the Chargers just gave him 40 mil guaranteed. They would have given us a 3rd or at worse a 4th in a tag and trade deal. They're going for it this and next year. They at least get him for this year for less than what they're paying in 2023 and would have elusive rights to sign him. I'm not often overly critical, but I think we might have missed the ball with that one.











