crawhammer
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2012
- Messages
- 5,131
- Reaction score
- 4,246
Seems like you've tried to weasel your way out of the clutchness debate since that clearly wasn't working out for you, even though you were the one insisting upon it.Again, the Pats were down 28-3 in large part thanks to the offense, which did nothing for 3.5 quarters and Brady throwing a pick 6 (I was at the game and it was miserable for most of the night). And Flacco did not dominate a single postseason the way JM did in 1989. Flacco threw for 11 TDs in FOUR games, but I'm sure you didn't even think about that, while Montana did it in 3. Again, pure dominance by JM in 1989, which will probably never be achieved again.
I don't think anyone said Montana wasn't dominant in the '89 postseason. Yes, he was. And?? He's not more clutch than Brady, no one is. He's not more accomplished than Brady, no one is. He had a dominant postseason, hell he had 19 TD's and only 1 INT combined in the '88 and '89 postseasons, outstanding. Montana was great. Just not as great as Brady, no one is.
Let's see if you know who said this:
"I think Tom has taken his place on the top up there a long time ago. He's had a tremendous career, he's fun to watch. Everybody always contests over that, but I think if you look at what Tom has been able to accomplish in his time that he's played, I think it puts him definitely up there at the top of the list. There's a lot of great guys, as I said, before me, you go back to Otto Graham, who won 10 or 11 championships. It's hard to compare them, but if you're looking at it, yeah, definitely Tom at that point."












