It's not. Sorry.
If you want to argue "But Mac will be one to add to the 7.....", that's fine. If you want to trot out some version of "But BB", that's your call. If you want to assert that the post is too vague for you, go for it. But trying to argue that an admittedly vague (something to the effect) reference to a statement made based upon an acknowledged unknown metric is "misleading"? That's just silliness. To repeat that post, with an edit to correct the spelling of the word "something":
There's nothing misleading there.