RE: The Brady v. Brees conversation, I certainly wouldn't say there are lightyears between the two. Brees is an exceptionally good QB, but Brady is better. How much better? I'd say 10-20%. I think what sets Brady apart from most is that he doesn't make back-breaking mistakes that lose his team games - that's one of his most important traits, along with the fact that he's mentally tough and elevates his play in the face of adversity and pressure.
I do think Wozzy has a fair point, though, and that is football teams win games. One needs to simply look at 2007-2011, when the Patriots won zero Super Bowls despite Brady arguably playing the best football of his career during that stretch, with his two of his three MVPs coming during that period of time (2007, 2011). The team didn't fail to win a Super Bowl because Brady wasn't lifting the team and carrying them; they failed to win a Super Bowl because a team comprised of 45/53 individuals, offense, defense, and special teams, didn't play well enough over the course of 3-to-4 postseason games.
For every offensive game-winning play, there is often a defensive or special teams equivalent.
The Patriots don't win in 2014/15 without Brady's clinical drives late in the Seattle Super Bowl including his lasers to Jules and Gronk; likewise, they don't win if Hightower doesn't make a crucial tackle and Malcolm Butler doesn't make the play of his life.
The Patriots don't win in 2016/17 without Brady's perfect 18 minutes + OT to finish that game; likewise, they don't win without Hightower's strip sack, or Long forcing a holding call to knock the Falcons out of FG range.
The Patriots don't win in 2018/19 without Brady's dime to Gronk to move the ball to the goal-line; likewise, they don't win without the defense not allowing a TD, holding the Rams high-powered offense to 3 total points over the course of 60 minutes.
This also goes in the opposite direction:
2007 - Brady engineers a beautiful drive to finally give the Pats the lead late in the game, but ultimately doesn't walk away with a Super Bowl victory because the defense couldn't make a stop or catch multiple INTs ... coupled with horrible officiating.
I think the point Wozzy is making is that Super Bowl victories, by their very nature, are completely team-dependent. You can have the most talented players, including the most talented QB, but if the team doesn't play complete games in the postseason, you will not win a Super Bowl.
Obviously the QB position has a relatively large amount of influence on the outcome of games and Brady deserves all the credit in the world for the Patriots' postseason successes - he's the undisputed GOAT and there's no QB I'd rather have. That said, Super Bowl victories are always team achievements.