dtbrks
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2006
- Messages
- 3,877
- Reaction score
- 1,978
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Youre right brady blew it out this year!That’s dumb. It isn’t a competition between the two of them.
Last I checked BB is the GM of the Patriots. And he failed to shop properly for groceries, failed to restock in the draft, failed to get the right free agents or make trades to bolster this talent deprived roster. How to afford Brady? Salary cap management is a question for BB the GM. But BB the GM said No Mas. BB the GM decided Brady was washed up and didn't even offer 2 years. And as usual Booby Kraft caved like a house of cards and backed BB rather than Brady.
And now we get to watch the Tampa Bay Bucs, formerly Doormats of the NFL, goto the EFFING Superbowl with Brady.
You are completely missing the pointWhen the game’s on the line you make that call! Packers lost this game in the red zone. Inability to score.
I said he would choke.Stephen A Smith lol.. Rodgers is a baddddd man... Lol... Bad in the clutch...
Lol
which is not ideal since GB still had to get a TD after the FG. Whereas a TD and even a missed 2 pt conversion, they still had a better chance of getting into FG range ftw if they got the ball back. and if they got nothing, they still got TB near the goal line and good field position if GB's D forces a punt.that's why i've got to think he was told before that play that they were kicking on 4th if they didn't get it in
Rodgers has to be so mad at LaFleur for kicking that FG.
Brady had a good year, yes. Not sure what that has to do with BB or this mythical contest between the two.Youre right brady blew it out this year!
He could be mad at himself for not running it in on 3rd downRodgers has to be so mad at LaFleur for kicking that FG.
Not good !Sore losers will talk about the officiating tomorrow. The fact of the matter is that the packers had chances and blew them. Anyone know Rodgers’s record when trailing by 10 points or more?
The Bucs defense stepped up big on 3 straight possessions after it became a 5 point game. That was some great football the last 10 minutes of the game. Kicking the FG made no sense.Sore losers will talk about the officiating tomorrow. The fact of the matter is that the packers had chances and blew them. Anyone know Rodgers’s record when trailing by 10 points or more?
This is exhibit ‘A’ of the nonsense, intellectually dishonest takes.
I believe that you're a child for not having the capacity that if all things are equal that brady is the person who actually plays the game has more affect on the success of the outcome of the game than the one who doesn't and if you think bills inability to manage his own roster and cap is somehow an excuse as to why brady isn't here holds up on under running water then you're not able to hold the debate from an honest and good faith position.If you believe there's a competition between the two you're a child, if you think the Pats could afford to keep Brady you're a child with poor math skills, if you think Brady wanted to play on a team with a bunch of UDFA jags and 22 year olds after they had to let a bunch of other vets (Thuney, both McCourtys, Byrd, Elumenor & more) go you're a child on meth.
That’s dumb. It isn’t a competition between the two of them.
if you think this is even a valid discussion (bill vs brady), then you probably shouldn't post in this forum any more
That much maligned defense stepping way up.The Bucs defense stepped up big on 3 straight possessions after it became a 5 point game. That was some great football the last 10 minutes of the game. Kicking the FG made no sense.
The only thing dishonest is not accepting that brady success post bill is leagues and miles so far ahead that not accepting that is being blatantly ignorant. Brady success does NOT DIMINISH bill abilities or accomplishment. But the two can NOT have equal claim to the success and we have very fine evidence in this moment of time of which actually mattered more. Brady dragged a bumb like arians to the Superbowl. Out respect in his name. Hes earned it.
I believe that you're a child for not having the capacity that if all things are equal that brady the person who actually plays the game has more affect on the success of the outcome of the game than the one who doesn't and if you think bills inability to manage his own roster and cap is somehow an excuse as to why brady isn't here holds up on under running water then you're not able to hold the debate from an honest and good faith position.
It's not dumb to compare the two success apart from each other. It's literally the only metric that matters.
Yea my bad. Bills winning record without brady and Tom not reaching a superbowl in his first season away must indicate that I'm so out of left field with my factually based opinion that I should be banned from speaking on the matter. You wrong. You don't know sports. White while behind.