OT: Arrest Warrants issued for Giants Bakers and Seahawks Dunbar

[captain stone]

Does diarrhea smell different than a regular sh#t?

Yes it does...sometimes not much at all if you're pooping like that as part of a pre-colonoscopy procedure...take it from someone who's gone through two of them...

 

[venecol]

The fact you think OJ was “found innocent” - and therefore you believe he is innocent - shows how stupid you are. Don’t get mad at me, you’re only making yourself look foolish. Don’t worry. The criminals you love so dearly will pay the necessary bribes and get off.

Why do I suspect you wouldn’t be so supportive of “innocent until proven guilty” if, say, we were discussing those two guys in Georgia?

Making a statement of fact, that OJ was found not guilty, doesn't say anything about the way I feel about the result of that verdict one way or the other, but it's not surprising that your limited intellect can't tell the difference.

It is telling that you believe two Black NFL players are "guilty" solely based on witness accounts, yet discount witness accounts that exculpate them. Yet, you believe the two White guys in GA that chased down a Black young man and shot him dead, are innocent even though there is video evidence showing what actually happened.

This just reinforces your clear and present prejudice towards minorities. You along with your buddy ToBeRacist are just two of the better known examples of the classless trash that hangs around this forum.

 

[XLIX]

Making a statement of fact, that OJ was found not guilty, doesn't say anything about the way I feel about the result of that verdict one way or the other, but it's not surprising that your limited intellect can't tell the difference.

Actually you said he was “found innocent”. Obviously you’re too stupid to realize no such thing exists.

But go on believing OJ is innocent because some jury found him not guilty. You only make yourself look more and more foolish.

 

[venecol]

Actually you said he was “found innocent”. Obviously you’re too stupid to realize no such thing exists.

But go on believing OJ is innocent because some jury found him not guilty. You only make yourself look more and more foolish.

Your obsession for OJ is awesome. Repeating some falsehood over and over again doesn't make it true. Not even your deranged leader can get away with that nowadays. Now go take your daily pill of hydroxychloroquine, and don't forget the zinc, you sycophant. Lmao.

 

[XLIX]

Your obsession for OJ is awesome. Repeating some falsehood over and over again doesn't make it true. Not even your deranged leader can get away with that nowadays. Now go take your daily pill of hydroxychloroquine, and don't forget the zinc, you sycophant. Lmao.

I'm just taking your own logic and using it against you. You're simply too stupid to realize how easily I got you to paint yourself into a corner.

 

[venecol]

I'm just taking your own logic and using it against you. You're simply too stupid to realize how easily I got you to paint yourself into a corner.

Your reading comprehension is truly pathetic. Let me give you a recap:

1. I posted two articles from AP and Reuters on status of the thread case, that there were witness affidavits in favor of the players and did not provide any commentary;
2. You got triggered and decided to sarcastically state "they must be innocent" because a defense attorney says so (which is their job genius), and you proceeded to state:"I guess OJ is innocent too, huh?"
3. I replied that in fact OJ was not found guilty (though I said found innocent), which is a fact and again offered no commentary;
4. You've then proceeded 3 times to attribute to me that I believe that OJ is innocent when I have never said that. In fact, the only person that uttered the words "I guess OJ is innocent" was you.

You can't fail to graduate from H.S. and then complain when all the minorities make more money than you, causing you to constantly complain about racism against ignorant whites like yourself. Take the GED, try to better yourself and stop painting yourself into a corner with your own words.

 

[XLIX]

Your reading comprehension is truly pathetic. Let me give you a recap:

1. I posted two articles from AP and Reuters on status of the thread case, that there were witness affidavits in favor of the players and did not provide any commentary;
2. You got triggered and decided to sarcastically state "they must be innocent" because a defense attorney says so (which is their job genius), and you proceeded to state:"I guess OJ is innocent too, huh?"
3. I replied that in fact OJ was not found guilty (though I said found innocent), which is a fact and again offered no commentary;
4. You've then proceeded 3 times to attribute to me that I believe that OJ is innocent when I have never said that. In fact, the only person that uttered the words "I guess OJ is innocent" was you.

You can't fail to graduate from H.S. and then complain when all the minorities make more money than you, causing you to constantly complain about racism against ignorant whites like yourself. Take the GED, try to better yourself and stop painting yourself into a corner with your own words.

I easily manipulated you into painting yourself into a corner. (Don't worry, I am not proud of how easy it was given your childlike mind.) You're not even intelligent enough to see how you contradict yourself, so let me spell it out for you in plain English:

You wrote: "Innocent until proven guilty, that's the law of the land. Your belief they're already guilty based on arrest warrants shows how stupid and un-American you are." According to that logic, OJ is innocent.

Don't blame me for your own logical failure, and it's really not my fault you are just too much of a moron to understand simple logic.

 

[venecol]

I easily manipulated you into painting yourself into a corner. (Don't worry, I am not proud of how easy it was given your childlike mind.) You're not even intelligent enough to see how you contradict yourself, so let me spell it out for you in plain English:

You wrote: "Innocent until proven guilty, that's the law of the land. Your belief they're already guilty based on arrest warrants shows how stupid and un-American you are." According to that logic, OJ is innocent.

Don't blame me for your own logical failure, and it's really not my fault you are just too much of a moron to understand simple logic.

Wow, you are really really dumb.

1. "Innocent until proven guilty" is the law of the land. Are you disputing this?

2. "Your belief they are already guilty based on arrest warrants (...)" I am clearly talking about the 2 NFL players which are the topic of the thread and that statement has nothing to do with OJ because guess what, the only person that keeps on bringing up OJ is you.

How you conclude from the above two sentences that: "according to that logic, OJ is innocent."
is beyond me. But here we are again, with you stating that OJ is innocent. This is the second time you say that OJ is innocent, not me, but you.

In fact on a previous post (that for some reason was deleted), I said: "I don't know if these guys are guilty or not (nor do I care) but having a warrant issued for your arrest is hardly enough to condemn someone. But we are in the age of SM and the Country is overrun with idiots and morons so shouldn't be surprised."

You just proved the last sentence, thank you. Until you get your GED refrain from having discussions with adults when anything more than a 6th grade level of reading comprehension is required to avoid yourself further embarrassment.

 

[XLIX]

Wow, you are really really dumb.

1. "Innocent until proven guilty" is the law of the land. Are you disputing this?

2. "Your belief they are already guilty based on arrest warrants (...)" I am clearly talking about the 2 NFL players which are the topic of the thread and that statement has nothing to do with OJ because guess what, the only person that keeps on bringing up OJ is you.

How you conclude from the above two sentences that: "according to that logic, OJ is innocent."
is beyond me. But here we are again, with you stating that OJ is innocent. This is the second time you say that OJ is innocent, not me, but you.

In fact on a previous post (that for some reason was deleted), I said: "I don't know if these guys are guilty or not (nor do I care) but having a warrant issued for your arrest is hardly enough to condemn someone. But we are in the age of SM and the Country is overrun with idiots and morons so shouldn't be surprised."

You just proved the last sentence, thank you. Until you get your GED refrain from having discussions with adults when anything more than a 6th grade level of reading comprehension is required to avoid yourself further embarrassment.

Here's a question I know you will be too gutless to answer: In your opinion, is OJ guilty of murder? We all know what the verdict was (actually you ignorantly thought he was "found innocent" but I had to correct you as I so often do). I am not asking you what the verdict was. I am simply asking you for your personal belief regarding what happened.

Man up and answer the question.

 

[venecol]

Here's a question I know you will be too gutless to answer: In your opinion, is OJ guilty of murder? We all know what the verdict was (actually you ignorantly thought he was "found innocent" but I had to correct you as I so often do). I am not asking you what the verdict was. I am simply asking you for your personal belief regarding what happened.

Man up and answer the question.

It's nice to see that after going around in circles like a chicken with its head cut off using tarot cards and crystal balls to conjecture what I believe in the OJ case, you finally realized your mistake and are now straight up asking. There may be hope for you yet.

To your question, from everything that I know, I believe that it is highly likely that OJ committed the crimes. That means there is little doubt. I'm not the type of person that can flat out say something is 100% when I'm not there or am aware of the facts and details. As an engineer, I like to make decisions and judgements based on facts and not conjecture even when I have to make assumptions in order to arrive at a solution to a problem.

I'm sure you'll try to spin this in the contorted way that you think to say that I believe he is innocent. Whatever man, I'm done with your nonsense.

 

[XLIX]

To your question, from everything that I know, I believe that it is highly likely that OJ committed the crimes.

But wait a second... just a few posts ago you were telling us all: "Innocent until proven guilty, that's the law of the land."

So now I've exposed you for being the total hypocrite you are.

 

[venecol]

But wait a second... just a few posts ago you were telling us all: "Innocent until proven guilty, that's the law of the land."

So now I've exposed you for being the total hypocrite you are.

And that still holds true, despite my or your opinion in the matter. The fact you don't seem to understand this simple concept is baffling.

Innocent people are found guilty in a court of law just as guilty people are found innocent in a court of law. Neither of those outcomes disprove that at the time of the original charge, by law, you are perceived to be innocent until proven guilty. But you know this, you're just playing stupid childish games to get some sort of perverted satisfaction, looking for a cheap victory on an online forum after you've already been outclassed.

Don't forget to take your hydroxychloroquine and to shine some UV rays up your ass.

 

[XLIX]

And that still holds true, despite my or your opinion in the matter. The fact you don't seem to understand this simple concept is baffling.

Innocent people are found guilty in a court of law just as guilty people are found innocent in a court of law. Neither of those outcomes disprove that at the time of the original charge, by law, you are perceived to be innocent until proven guilty. But you know this, you're just playing stupid childish games to get some sort of perverted satisfaction, looking for a cheap victory on an online forum after you've already been outclassed.

Don't forget to take your hydroxychloroquine and to shine some UV rays up your ass.

LOL!! There are few things more pathetic than someone stating "Whatever man, I'm done with your nonsense" and then not even being able to honor your own commitment.

What a pathetic, weak willed individual you are.

 

[venecol]

LOL!! There are few things more pathetic than someone stating "Whatever man, I'm done with your nonsense" and then not even being able to honor your own commitment.

What a pathetic, weak willed individual you are.

The only thing pathetic is how overly exposed you've been during this exchange. At every single turn, for every point you tried to make and had to abandon, you've come across as a sub-moronic troll with no semblance of intelligence or capacity for debate.

As expected from a troglodyte, you're only left with ad hominems. Have a good night LXIX.

 

[XLIX]

As expected from a troglodyte, you're only left with ad hominems. Have a good night LXIX.

LOL! It's hilarious how much you have a complete lack of self-awareness, and can't even see the irony in your own statements.

Listen, it's not my fault I manipulated you so easily. Quite honestly, it was child's play.

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

This is going well..

 

[n6249c]

Yes it does...sometimes not much at all if you're pooping like that as part of a pre-colonoscopy procedure...take it from someone who's gone through two of them...

Damn. There goes my belief you’re always full of s**t.

I can sympathize, I’ve had a couple of them myself. So I know there were at least a couple of days when I wasn’t full of it either.

 

[captain stone]

Damn. There goes my belief you’re always full of s**t.

I can sympathize, I’ve had a couple of them myself. So I know there were at least a couple of days when I wasn’t full of it either.

Amazing how quickly that stuff goes through you...

 

[n6249c]

Amazing how quickly that stuff goes through you...

Yeah. You know what that stuff is?

Polyethylene glycol.

Clinical grade industrial solvent .

damn is it good at cleaning out the GI tract!

 

[Lavictoire]

Well since the cops say they are guilty, it must be true..!! LOL

OJ was found innocent, yes!

He was found guilty in the civil trial and owes a lot of money. He practically admitted it too with that book and TV special "if... I DID IT" oh how clever.