- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 30,865
- Reaction score
- 29,555
Hes dug in.
No use.
Atleast hes moved on from the AB obsession
I would hardly call anything I said about AB an "obsession."
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hes dug in.
No use.
Atleast hes moved on from the AB obsession
Really? So giving 50% people a false impression that they have coronavirus when they don't, and vice versa, is better than nothing?
Watching a movie ... screw that.Bad time to discuss the democratic political debate?
I am apart of a democratic household so its pretty important here. However for the sake of this thread, I will leave it there!Watching a movie ... screw that.
What’s the end game here?
You eventually, through persistence and persuasion, convince Tony that Trump has indeed handled this okay. Tony’s newfound enlightenment spreads to every member of the board.
Guys, Trump did good! Let’s give him a good sticker. Oh by the way, Coronavirus is now deep-seated in society, and while we were discussing it and reading TommyBrady’s arguments for the last six weeks, a lot of our family members died.
But it was worth it.
LOLHas anyone made a MyCarona parody song yet?
I would hardly call anything I said about AB an "obsession."
LOL
Earlier I was singing "COVID-19" to the old Dexys Midnight Runners tune, "Come on Eileen"
Really? So giving 50% people a false impression that they have coronavirus when they don't, and vice versa, is better than nothing?
OMG. LOLZo and Bertrand had Hardy's version of mycorna plying last week
Brilliant!I hope the stores here get some toilet paper pretty soon. The kid I hired to clean the dog **** out of my back yard is going to figure out pretty soon that I dont have a dog.
I hope the stores here get some toilet paper pretty soon. The kid I hired to clean the dog **** out of my back yard is going to figure out pretty soon that I dont have a dog.
If I had watched that I would have missed this:Bad time to discuss the democratic political debate?
I hope the stores here get some toilet paper pretty soon. The kid I hired to clean the dog **** out of my back yard is going to figure out pretty soon that I dont have a dog.
Look Tommy. Even if your 50% number was accurate although I doubt it is those same kits were used to effectively contain the virus in Asia.
Even if that weren't so, we could have used those kits to start plotting the virus's course until the "perfect kits" arrived.
You're trying to make a case that waiting for the "perfect test kit" was the right move while a pandemic is sweeping through the country.
And who's saying they were only 50% effective?
I'm saying 50% is what I heard. It could be spin or a complete falsehood. In any event, I'm not defending what the Administration did on the test kit issue - you're just making that assumption. I'm simply saying that the reason why the Feds did not use the WHO test kit was because they wanted a better kit.
Bernie and his hands..Jesus