i understand that, but he writes a really long article citing 18? different reasons we lost, when in my opinion, it boiled down to these two things. didnt have to be 10,000 words
i understand that, but he writes a really long article citing 18? different reasons we lost, when in my opinion, it boiled down to these two things. didnt have to be 10,000 words
Fair enough, as I said above, I agree that it was a little padded. But I appreciated the article and the effort, so much of sports media is everyone regurgitating the same thing, and this was a little different. It was sort of an attempt to put a spin on the “butterfly flaps its wings” series of events that culminated in the Patriots loss and make you think about unforeseen consequences of seemingly minor events. It works to some degree, although not fully.