turkeyneck
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2006
- Messages
- 4,916
- Reaction score
- 6,614
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The .01% being Tomlinson?O'Leary...as is the case with 99.99% of active professional TEs...is better than LaGlasse & Izzo, combined.
One of these things is not like the other ...
Edited to add - I could see him replacing Izzo
What about this guy says he's better than Izzo?
How many players in the Belichick era really moved up from suck level?I'd like to keep Izzo...he's younger and has potential I guess. Lacosse is not going to suddenly be a better player. It's not saying much but he does have more receptions then LaCosse and maybe he is more durable. More of a FB size...but maybe that's a good thing.
The pats have not cut Izzo so the coaches must see room for improvement because even as a fan it is clear he has been limited to date. O’Leary has NFL experience and bye some accounts is a tough player. He was cut following a boneheaded mistake. I don’t know if he is a net upgrade but if Izzy can’t play why no try to find out.
As bad as lacrosse is, and he is really bad, I have to admit, I doubt O’Leary is good Enough to fill even an empty roster spot let alone a current players!
Ps: why is Kessler still on the team?
As bad as lacrosse is, and he is really bad, I have to admit,
Ps: why is Kessler still on the team?