- Joined
- Aug 13, 2005
- Messages
- 19,313
- Reaction score
- 12,919
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I am sure Rob Parker spent countless hours this past week researching all of the 6-0 teams in NFL history prior to reaching this unbiased scientific conclusion.
Go on...There is a racial element to this. But no one in the media is gonna call it out.
Are you his publicist? Because that's the only reason I could see for giving him exposure like this.
Pretty obvious why.Why is this board full of cranky old people in their 50s and 60s? Dude, just ignore the thread. That's why Ian has that feature
Why is this board full of cranky old people in their 50s and 60s? Dude, just ignore the thread. That's why Ian has that feature
Go on...
So the cranky old people in their 50s and 60s should ignore it, but the football players in their 20s and 30s and early 40s should continue to let it anger them and use it at motivation?
You need me to spell it out? lol
The guy (Parker) went out of his way and questioned RG3's 'blackness' because he doesn't act 'black' enough.
Parker wouldn't be going in on Brady if he was a black quarterback who's black enough for Parker (whatever that means).
Hahaha...DUDE, you already answered me once. If you start a dumb-ass thread don't get butt hurt if people call you out on it.Why is this board full of cranky old people in their 50s and 60s? Dude, just ignore the thread. That's why Ian has that feature
There is a racial element to this. But no one in the media is gonna call it out.
Hahaha...DUDE, you already answered me once. If you start a dumb-ass thread don't get butt hurt if people call you out on it.
“My board rating.”I'm not butt hurt, considering my board rating is a lot higher than yours