TommyD4207
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 7,121
- Reaction score
- 10,349
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's a lot tougher to return punts against NFL players, as opposed to UPS drivers.
Or because he looked better than average in the preseason, particularly for someone with limited experience and who offers other special team value.
This doesn't absolve him of being average so far (I'd say he's actually been below average to this point), nor does it diminish the clear desire to keep Edelman safe. But "desperation" is several steps too far.
?????????????
What ? Apart from one bad moment that unfortunately cost the team 7 points he looked damn good so far given where he is as a football player. Decisive, not dancing around or retreating, dynamic..
Seriously exactly what was below average so far ? Maybe the issue is you comparing his returns against third stringers in the preseason compared to how he looks against a NFL level ST group ?
Just for fun, here's JEII his rookie season and BB picking on Welker:
Yeah, it is...even BB disagreed publicly.OP's premise isn't as bad as 48 disagrees would indicate lol.
No it's not. Undrafted free agents who muff a punt and dont show much flash otherwise would tend to deserve an inactive. BUT this is a case of KR/PR not being a depth position and we need him to handle the role.Yeah, it is...even BB disagreed publicly.
Should be 148.OP's premise isn't as bad as 48 disagrees would indicate lol. But the fact is NEP needs him to perform in his role right now. Edelman should not be returning kicks early in the season at this stage in his career. He had a bad game but he made the team for a reason, if it becomes a trend then they sign someone else down the road.
Yes it was exactly as bad as 48 disagrees would indicate.OP's premise isn't as bad as 48 disagrees would indicate lol. But the fact is NEP needs him to perform in his role right now. Edelman should not be returning kicks early in the season at this stage in his career. He had a bad game but he made the team for a reason, if it becomes a trend then they sign someone else down the road.
its for confident reason obviously. BB didn’t chose the knee jerk reaction att.Should be 148.
Belichick put him back in on the very next punt return. He had other punt returners on the sideline, and chose to put in Gunner.
It's a stupid premise.
We all know how that's actually gonna work out.Looks like Bill made up an injury for Gunner to give him the break the OP suggested. Looks like a lot of you owe him an apology.
What nonsense? That a guy who is entirely replaceable be given a game off after a terrible outing?There aren't nearly enough red Xs on the OP, for this nonsense.
But you’re wrong. He has shown plenty, as his stats have proven. Top half of the league in PR avg. Not bad at all. He had one muffed punt in a blow out win, big ****ing deal. Edelman almost blew the win in KC last year on a PR. Where he was drafted doesn’t matter. What matters is that he plays several ST’s roles and can play DB and WR in a pinch if need be.No it's not. Undrafted free agents who muff a punt and dont show much flash otherwise would tend to deserve an inactive. BUT this is a case of KR/PR not being a depth position and we need him to handle the role.
If a RB can fumble and see the bench or jonas gray can rush for 200+ and be cast away( I know I know not a perfect analogy). And if Brandon Bolden can be inactive some games, then certainly Gunner can be inactive after a bad game. It's clearly a case of return specialist being a non depth position and would put him in a situation to be cut or play. Play is the right call.
I don’t think it was so much group think as you would like to believe. You made a post that came across as a knee jerk reaction and it was an absurd idea. You got slammed with disagrees because of it.What nonsense? That a guy who is entirely replaceable be given a game off after a terrible outing?
I get disagreeing with me and I'm fine with that but the level of backlash was ridiculous. If BB did sit him this afternoon nearly every one of you would have been praising it as a brilliant move.
Honestly you guys are acting like I said he should never play again. The groupthink here is similtaneously amazing and pathetic.
Oh, and it's not like our only other option on PR is Edelman. If I recall right Rex Burkhead has PR experience and has looked pretty good at it in the past. I believe Bolden also has PR experience, although not that recently. Sure, we've got a specialist PR guy, but if he's having trouble getting it done, we DO have alternatives