- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 8,099
- Reaction score
- 15,473
He could win in overtime, right?
LOL! FYI Buddy, the game being discussed was already in overtime.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He could win in overtime, right?
What's wrong with ties?
I can see wanting to win to turn the season around. But a tie counts for half a win if I understand the NFL rules correctly. (NFL standings: 8-6-2 team vs 9-7-0 team?). With that in mind, the percentages in that situation say get the tie and live to fight another day. The new NFL rules are going to lead to more teams getting 1 or 2 ties. It will make things interesting down the stretch.I’ve noticed that everyone has been absolutely ridiculing Colts HC Frank Reich for the decision of going for it on 4th down.
But why?
In my opinion, you NEVER play for a tie. You play to win. It was a 4th and 4. That’s very convertible. There’s no reason why you wouldn’t put the fate of the game in your best player’s hands.
This reminds me of people criticizing Bill for the 4th and 2 call. A little different of a situation. But ultimately, you can’t treat going for it on 4th as giving up a win. The idea is that you have to take risks in order to WIN games. I can’t fault that strategy.
I guess, from a theoretical perspective, a tie makes it a skirmish/battle rather than war. Deeply unsatisfying, certainly, but also important as relating to what each side lost (injuries, how deep they reached into the playbook) and learned (about themselves, about the other team's playbook).You’re at war with the other team for 70 minutes and it ends in a tie? I don’t think players like ties.
I hated ties when I played sports. It’s different in soccer though. Different setup. There’s no ties in the other 3 major American sports
Hilton left with a hamstring problem and did not return.62 passes and now on a short week? I like it
What's wrong with ties?
Herm Edwards wants his royalty payment.You play to win the game.
He could win in overtime, right?
Herm Edwards wants his royalty payment.
The issue from my pov is that he should had made that decision earlier and call accordingly on third down.
I think Ray was either being facetious (in which case, it was a funny remark) or had a few too many adult beverages watching the NFL all day and celebrating the Pats win (in which case, he is excused and hopefully got a good night's sleep).LOL! FYI Buddy, the game being discussed was already in overtime.
In football, they needlessly screw with records and seasons.
In apparel, most men choose ones that are poor matches for their suits, or are just plain ugly.
My main beef with the OT is that it’s 10 min long. What was wrong with 15 minutes. Did the players want this?