- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 3,832
- Reaction score
- 6,828
Not to sound sexist but I can't really stand female announcers trying to sound edgy/hip.The announcers suck
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Not to sound sexist but I can't really stand female announcers trying to sound edgy/hip.The announcers suck
Coming from a poster who thinks Richard Seymour sucks. That is your legacy on this board.Yes, yours is. Stick to sports you actually know something about. Smart is trash. Just like your basketball knowledge. And I'm dead serious.
Worst user on Patsfans?Yes, yours is. Stick to sports you actually know something about. Smart is trash. Just like your basketball knowledge. And I'm dead serious.
It's not sexist. I have zero problem with females commentating. Rebecca Lobo and the other woman on ESPN for the woman's NCAAs are excellent analysts.Not to sound sexist but I can't really stand female announcers trying to sound edgy/hip.
By farWorst user on Patsfans?
Worst user on Patsfans?
5 games max. Not w/o Kyrie. C's don't have the firepower
Not Simmons, he's not a rookie. I still think Mitchell has a slight edge over Tatum. But 3 years from now Tatum is the better player.
No. Just ban the a holeAn elimination tournament should be done!
These are your words: "I can't take the Brad Stevens hype seriously...". I rest my case.Yes, yours is. Stick to sports you actually know something about. Smart is trash. Just like your basketball knowledge. And I'm dead serious.
Brad is Popovitch without the rings.These are your words: "I can't take the Brad Stevens hype seriously...". I rest my case.
The ****heads don't see how he expands the floor or recognize his dribble penetration.For those who still fail to get it:
...when Smart is on the floor, the Celtics outscore their opponent by 11.3 points per 100 possessions (roughly one game). That's 7.9 points per 100 possessions better than when he's off the court. In other words, the Celtics jump from a solid team to an elite team when Smart is on the court.
But that's obviously the defense, right? After all, Smart is an omni-defender who can match up with all five positions, a bull in a china shop. The Celtics' defense is 1.5 points per 100 possessions better with him on the floor. That's where the good play comes from, right?
Except ... here's the thing ... when Smart is on the floor, the Celtics have a 106 offensive rating. That's second best among rotation players, and 6.8 points better than when he's on the bench.
I don't get why Smart isn't more popular among Celtics fans.. Besides the stats you so kindly provided (nice!), just watch the games... Guy makes big, impact plays on a routine basis. Sure he's not a superstar but one of those smart, gritty guys you WANT to have on your team.For those who still fail to get it:
...when Smart is on the floor, the Celtics outscore their opponent by 11.3 points per 100 possessions (roughly one game). That's 7.9 points per 100 possessions better than when he's off the court. In other words, the Celtics jump from a solid team to an elite team when Smart is on the court.
But that's obviously the defense, right? After all, Smart is an omni-defender who can match up with all five positions, a bull in a china shop. The Celtics' defense is 1.5 points per 100 possessions better with him on the floor. That's where the good play comes from, right?
Except ... here's the thing ... when Smart is on the floor, the Celtics have a 106 offensive rating. That's second best among rotation players, and 6.8 points better than when he's on the bench.
Who are you guys talking about? Not seeing their posts as I'm assuming I put them on ignore for past behavior.. And it takes a lot for me to put you on ignore, hell the 2 Jets fans haven't even made the cut yet lolBy far
Because he's not a scorer, shooter and takes long range 3s.I don't get why Smart isn't more popular among Celtics fans.. Besides the stats you so kindly provided (nice!), just watch the games... Guy makes big, impact plays on a routine basis. Sure he's not a superstar but one of those smart, gritty guys you WANT to have on your team.
Dafoe2016. Biggest idiot on this board.Who are you guys talking about? Not seeing their posts as I'm assuming I put them on ignore for past behavior.. And it takes a lot for me to put you on ignore, hell the 2 Jets fans haven't even made the cut yet lol
I'll say this: he's in the conversation for best coach. And I respect the hell out of Pop.Brad is Popovitch without the rings.
Agree. There is no debate.I'll say this: he's in the conversation for best coach. And I respect the hell out of Pop.
hes a streaky shooter. and he's prone to playing hero ball. his shot selection at times is poor. but he is an elite defender. he can guard anybody. he does it all on defense.I am legitimately terrified every time he touches the ball. God, he is terrible.
| 10 | 3K |
| 27 | 2K |
| 114 | 17K |
| 37 | 8K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










