In another thread I said we drafted two additional Elandon Robertses. I have to say that I fell victim to the CBS draft tracker's seemingly inaccurate characterization of him as a slow thumper, which I can't find corroboration of anywhere else. I now like this pick.
Should be solid versatile competition for Langi, M.Flowers, also on ST.
Although he did look like he lacks strength at times to me as well . the fact is he had the highest BP number of all Combine backers: 28 (Bentley not invited ) . so should be coachable.
In another thread I said we drafted two additional Elandon Robertses. I have to say that I fell victim to the CBS draft tracker's seemingly inaccurate characterization of him as a slow thumper, which I can't find corroboration of anywhere else. I now like this pick.
Should be solid versatile competition for Langi, M.Flowers, also on ST.
Although he did look like he lacks strength at times to me as well . the fact is he had the highest BP number of all Combine backers: 28 (Bentley not invited ) . so should be coachable.
Exactly that's what both these picks are. Depth, push current players & a possible hit on the drafted player in terms of fit w/ the team & chemistry w/ the staff/players.
Sam (or one of multiple reasonable facsimiles) could've likely been available at 219, where something called an Etling was chosen.
Falk vs Etling...before the 6th round began, who would the entire human race - except for the Etling family, maybe - have chosen between one or the other?