primetime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 13,627
- Reaction score
- 15,375
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He's Blount...but better. Blount may be bigger, but Hill runs with more power, and he can catch the ball.He is meh. Slow and meh vision
He's Blount...but better
Wow...that's all I can say!There us a reason the Bengals burried him and drafted Mixon.
Wow...that's all I can say!
Couldn’t disagree more. He breaks some long runs, runs hard and with good balance, can make defenders miss. Hits the hole hard, and vision wise, hits the right hole most times (that’s what she said).He is meh. Slow and meh vision
You've got to be kidding me. I've read alot of your posts, and you're a pretty intelligent guy, why in the world would you have that conclusion on Hill?!You will see. I'd be surprised if he makes the team
He's Blount...but better. Blount may be bigger, but Hill runs with more power, and he can catch the ball.
ChrisR2223 endorses this message!Jeremy Hill does not suck...
You can not compare RB stats with Cincy RB's. Marvin is clueless.At this point in their careers (hill being 25 Blount being 30) id bet on hill being better going forward even though Im not a fan. Up to this point in their careers Blount has been the better overall runner in ypc as it’s been 3 years since hill has hit the 4.0 yard mark. We need rookie season Jeremy hill to show up in 2018.
Chris...you know that'd be at the expense of your Binky...right?Contract details?
Why did Mike Gill look great in the Chiefs game then never saw the field after?
Becuase we telegraphed the run?
Sometimes you just need to pound it.
I want to see Gill make the roster.
Hopefully not too many fumbles.
Yeah that's my one worry with him...
High and tight. High and tight.
You've got to be kidding me. I've read alot of your posts, and you're a pretty intelligent guy, why in the world would you have that conclusion on Hill?!